Comparison of intubating conditions following propofol and succinylcholine with propofol and remifentanil 2 μg kg-1 or 4 μg kg-1

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 85, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 623-625

  McNeil, I A ^a   Culbert, B ^a   Russell, I ^a  

^a HULL ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anaesthetics i.v.; Analgesics opioid; Intubation tracheal; Neuromuscular block; Propofol; Remifentanil; Succinylcholine

Indexed keywords

PROPOFOL; REMIFENTANIL; SUXAMETHONIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; APNEA; ARTICLE; BOLUS INJECTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

EID: 0033808063     PISSN: 00070912     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bja/85.4.623     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Routine suxamethonium in children. A regional survey of current usage
2. Tracheal intubation without the use of muscle relaxants: A technique using propofol and varying doses of alfentanil
3. Comparison of intubation following propofol and alfentanil with intubation following thiopentone and suxamethonium
4. Measured context sensitive half times of remifentanil and alfentanil
5. Dose comparison of remifentanil and alfentanil for loss of consciousness