What is so important about systematic reviews

Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Volumn 102, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 239-240

  Clarke, M ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PSYCHOTROPIC AGENT; WARFARIN;

DECISION MAKING; EDITORIAL; MEDICAL LITERATURE; META ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; RANDOMIZATION; RELIABILITY; RESEARCH;

EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; REVIEW LITERATURE;

EID: 0033807818     PISSN: 0001690X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2000.102004239.x     Document Type: Editorial

References (12)

1. Psychotropic interactions with warfarin
2. The causes, consequences and detection of publication bias in psychiatry
3. Discussion sections in reports of controlled trials published in general medical journals: Islands in search of continents?
4. Content and quality of 2000 controlled trials in schizophrenia over 50 years
5. Ovarian ablation in breast cancer, 1896 to 1998: Milestones along hierarchy of evidence from case report to Cochrane review
6. Obtaining data from randomised controlled trials: How much do we need to perform reliable and informative meta-analyses?
7. Bias in location and selection of studies
8. Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook 4.0 [updated July 1999]
9. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: The QUOROM statement. Quality of reporting of meta-analyses
10. The cochrane methodology register
11. Checklists for review articles