Rise time or rise rate: Which should be a criterion for analysing motor unit action potentials?

Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 381-383

  Masakado, Y ^a   Akaboshi, K ^a   Kimura, A ^a   Chino, N ^a  

^a KEIO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS; ARTICLE; BICEPS BRACHII MUSCLE; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; HAND MUSCLE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR UNIT POTENTIAL; MUSCLE ACTION POTENTIAL; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; NORMAL HUMAN;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ADULT; ARM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FINGERS; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR NEURONS; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0033798284     PISSN: 0301150X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. On the selection of concentric needle electromyogram motor unit action potentials: Is the rise time criterion too restrictive?
2. AAEM minimonograph no. 11: Needle examination in clinical electromyography
3. Data on fibre size in thirty-six human muscles in autopsy study
4. Quantitative analysis of individual motor unit potentials: A proposition of standardized terminology and criteria for measurement
5. Multi-MUP analysis - A two year experience in daily clinical work