Vascular registries - Are they worth the effort?

European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 225-226

  Jensen, Lp ^a   Troeng T ^b  

^a GENTOFTE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b BLEKINGE HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; EDITORIAL; HEALTH CARE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL AUDIT; MONEY; NEW ZEALAND; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGISTER; RELIABILITY; SCANDINAVIA; TIME; UNITED KINGDOM; VALIDATION PROCESS; VASCULAR DISEASE;

EID: 0033797536     PISSN: 10785884     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/ejvs.2000.1190     Document Type: Editorial

References (8)

1. VRISS. (Vascular Registry in Southern Sweden): The Vascular Registry - A responsibility for all vascular surgeons?
2. Introduction of a population-based vascular registry: Validity of data and limitations of registration
3. Swedvasc. Auditing Surgical outcome. Ten years with The Swedish Vascular Registry-Swedvasc
4. The importance of complete follow-up for results after femoro-infrapopliteal vascular surgery
5. Patients not included in medical audit have a worse outcome that those included
6. Risk-factors for postoperative intestinal ischaemia after aortoiliac surgery. A combined cohort and case-control study of 2824 operations
7. Factors affecting the results of surgery for chronic critical leg ischaemia - A nationwide study
8. Influence of transportation distance on mortality in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms