Japanese patients' preferences for receiving cancer test results while in the United States: Introducing an advance directive for cancer disclosure

Journal of Palliative Medicine

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 361-374

  Fetters, M D ^a   Masuda, Y ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER TEST; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; JAPAN; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PATIENT ATTITUDE; SELF REPORT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0033796225     PISSN: 10966218     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2000.3.361     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Culture, illness, and care: Clinical lessons from anthropological and cross cultural research
2. Managing diversity: The mandate of the 90's
3. Crossing the cultural divide
4. Managing diversity
5. Culturally effective communication
6. An international survey of physician attitudes and practice in regard to revealing the diagnosis of cancer
7. Truth telling to the patient
8. Cancer diagnosis disclosure in a Spanish hospital
9. What do gastroenterologists in Europe tell cancer patients?
10. What do advanced cancer patients know of their disease? A report from Italy
11. Should doctors inform terminally ill patients? The opinions of nationals and doctors in the United Arab Emirates
12. Curable cancers and fatal ulcers, attitudes toward cancer in Japan
13. Group wants doctors to inform patients more fully
14. Cancer patients speak out
15. Horrors haunt Japan's vaunted medical system
16. Level with terminal patients, let them plan, surgeon urges
17. Tokyo journal - When doctor won't tell cancer patient the truth
18. Religion of the patient and medical ethics
19. Patients' rights in Japan
20. Japanese doctors keep quiet
21. When silence isn't golden
22. Tokyo perspective: Informed consent
23. Cancer disclosure in Japan: Historical comparisons, current practices
24. The family in medical decision making: Japanese perspectives
25. Informed consent and truth telling to cancer patients
26. Gan to songenshi ni kansuru zenkoku seron chosa
27. Gan kokuchi 'shirasenai' ga 58%, sakunen yori 4 pointo zou
28. The patient's right to know of a cancer diagnosis: A comparison of Japanese paternalism and American self-determination
29. The medical directive: A comprehensive advance care document
30. From the office of the general counsel: Advance medical directives
31. Advance directives for medical care: A case for greater use
32. Should physicians tell patients the truth?
33. A report from Japan. Choices of Japanese patients in the face of disagreement
34. Offering truth: One ethical approach to the uniformed cancer patient
35. A qualitative approach to primary care research: The long interview
36. Ethnography: A stepwise approach for primary care researchers
37. Feminisms and models of qualitative research
38. On studying the discourse of medical encounters: A critique of quantitative and qualitative methods and a proposal for reasonable compromise
39. Field notes: How to take, code, and manage them
40. Designing funded qualitative research
41. Primary care research: A multimethod typology and qualitative road map
42. Patients' preferences for learning the results of mammographic examinations
43. An examination of wishes of Japanese concerning cancer disclosure and the various factors influencing it
44. Shoukakikei shinkougan no byoumei to byouki no kokuchi-Daigaku byouin gekai no shinri ni oyobosu yogo no eikyou
45. We live too short and die too long - On Japanese and U.S. physicians' caregiving practices and approaches to withholding life sustaining treatments
46. A care provider perspective on advance directives and surrogate decision making for incompetent adults in the United States
47. Advance directives on admission: Clinical implications and anlysis of the Patient Self-Determination Act of 1990
48. Resuscitation decision making in the elderly: The value of outcome data
49. The use of living wills at the end of life
50. Increasing the use of advance directives in medical outpatients
51. What do patients express at their preferences in advance directives?
52. Ethnicity and attitudes towards patient autonomy