![]() |
Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 393-395
|
The morality of coercion
|
Author keywords
Autonomy; Coercion; Informed consent; Patient rights
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
AUTHORITY;
CARCINOMA;
CASE REPORT;
FEMALE;
HEALTH CARE POLICY;
HUMAN;
INFORMED CONSENT;
ISRAEL;
LAW;
MALE;
MEDICAL ETHICS;
MEDICAL PRACTICE;
MENTAL CAPACITY;
MORALITY;
PATIENT CARE;
PATIENT RIGHT;
PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION;
PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
PROFESSIONAL STANDARD;
TREATMENT INDICATION;
ULCEROGENESIS;
LEGAL APPROACH;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
AGED;
CARCINOMA, BASAL CELL;
COERCION;
ETHICS, MEDICAL;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
INFORMED CONSENT;
ISRAEL;
MORALS;
PATERNAL BEHAVIOR;
PATIENT ADVOCACY;
PATIENT PARTICIPATION;
PROFESSIONAL AUTONOMY;
|
EID: 0033789909
PISSN: 03066800
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1136/jme.26.5.393 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (11)
|
References (14)
|