|
Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 362-367
|
A comparison of trends in problematic drug misuse from two reporting systems
|
Author keywords
General practitioners; Substance abuse; Surveillance
|
Indexed keywords
AMPHETAMINE;
ANALGESIC AGENT;
BARBITURIC ACID;
BENZODIAZEPINE;
CANNABIS;
COCAINE;
DIAMORPHINE;
GLUE;
LYSERGIDE;
NARCOTIC AGENT;
OPIATE;
PSYCHEDELIC AGENT;
PSYCHOSTIMULANT AGENT;
SOLVENT;
ARTICLE;
COMORBIDITY;
DATA BASE;
DRUG ABUSE;
DRUG MONITORING;
DRUG OVERDOSE;
GENERAL PRACTICE;
HUMAN;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
SUBSTANCE ABUSE;
DATA COLLECTION;
DATABASES, FACTUAL;
DIAGNOSIS, DUAL (PSYCHIATRY);
ENGLAND;
FAMILY PRACTICE;
HOSPITALIZATION;
HUMANS;
POPULATION SURVEILLANCE;
REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;
|
EID: 0033778840
PISSN: 09574832
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/22.3.362 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (7)
|
References (14)
|