|
Volumn 47, Issue 35, 2000, Pages 1332-1336
|
Endoscopic injection therapy vs. multipolar electrocoagulation vs. laser vs. injection + octreotide vs. injection + omeprazole in the treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers. A prospective randomized study
a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a |
Author keywords
Bleeding peptic ulcers; Endoscopic hemostasis
|
Indexed keywords
OCTREOTIDE;
OMEPRAZOLE;
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
ELECTROCOAGULATION;
ENDOSCOPIC THERAPY;
FEMALE;
GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE;
HEMOSTASIS;
HIGH RISK POPULATION;
HOSPITALIZATION;
HUMAN;
LASER SURGERY;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
NEODYMIUM LASER;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROGNOSIS;
PROSPECTIVE STUDY;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
ANTI-ULCER AGENTS;
BLOOD TRANSFUSION;
ELECTROCOAGULATION;
ETHANOL;
FEMALE;
HEMOSTASIS, ENDOSCOPIC;
HEMOSTATIC TECHNIQUES;
HEMOSTATICS;
HUMANS;
INJECTIONS;
LASER COAGULATION;
LENGTH OF STAY;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
OCTREOTIDE;
OMEPRAZOLE;
PEPTIC ULCER HEMORRHAGE;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
|
EID: 0033777539
PISSN: 01726390
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (15)
|
References (38)
|