Clinical value of corticosteroids in acute and cumulative experimental irritant dermatitis in man

Dermatologie in Beruf und Umwelt

Volumn 48, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 179-182

  Levin, Cheryl ^a   Maibach, Howard I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Corticosteroids; Irritant dermatitis; Sodium laurylsulfate; Topical; Transepidermal water loss

Indexed keywords

CLOBETASOL PROPIONATE; CORTICOSTEROID; DODECYL SULFATE SODIUM; HYDROCORTISONE; PETROLATUM; TRIAMCINOLONE ACETONIDE;

ACUTE DISEASE; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORTICOSTEROID THERAPY; DRUG EFFICACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IRRITANT DERMATITIS; MALE; PROTEIN DENATURATION; SKIN SURFACE; SKIN WATER LOSS; STRATUM CORNEUM;

EID: 0033777414     PISSN: 1438776X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Peets, E. A., Maibach, H. L, Topical Corticosteroids: Experience with Mometasone Furcate, in: Irritant Dermatitis New Clinical and Experimental Aspects, P. Elsner, H. I. Maibach (eds.), pp. 207-210. Karger AG, New York (1995)
2. Van der Valk, P. G. M., Maibach, H. I., Do Topical Corticosteroids modulate Skin Irritation in Human Beings? Assessment by Transepidermal Water Loss and Visual Scoring. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 21, 519-520 (1995)
3. Ramsing, D. W., Agner, T., Efficacy of Topical Corticosteroids on Irritant Skin Reactions. Contact Dermatitis 32, 293-297 (1995)
4. Le, T. K. M., De Mon, P., Schalkwijk, J., et al., Effect of a Topical Corticosteroid, a Retinoid and a Vitamin D3 Derivative on Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate Induced Skin Irritation. Contact Dermatitis 37, 19-26 (1997)
5. Berardesca, E., Maibach, H. L, Bioengineering and the Patch Test. Contact Dermatitis 18, 3-9 (1988)
6. Agner, T., Serup, J., Sodium Lauryl Sulphate for Patch Testing: A Dose-Response Study Using Bioengineering Methods for Determination of Skin Irritation. J. Invest. Dermatol. 95, 543-547 (1990)
7. Treffel, R, Gabard, B., Measurements of Sodium Lauryl Sulphate-induced Skin Irritation. Acta Dermatol. Venereol. 76, 341-343 (1996)
8. Farr, P. M., Diffey, B. L., Quantitative Studies on Cutaneous Erythema Induced by Ultraviolet Radiation. Br. J. Dermatol. 111, 673-682 (1984)
9. Frosch, P. J., Kligman, A. M., The Soap Chamber Test. A New Method for assessing the Irritancy of Soaps. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1, 35-41 (1979)
10. Tupker, R., Vermeulen, K., Fidler, V. et al., Irritancy Testing of Sodium Lauryl Sulphate and Other Anionic Detergents Using an Open Exposure Model. Skin Res. Technol. 3, 133-136(1997)
11. Wilhelm, K. P., Saunders, J. C, Maibach, H. I., Increased Stratum Corneum Turnover Induced by Subclinical Irritant Dermatitis. Br. J. Dermatol. 122, 793-798 (1990)
12. Lee, C. H., Maibach, H. I., Study of Cumulative Irritant Contact Dermatitis in Man Utilizing Open Application on Subclinically Irritated Skin. Contact Dermatitis 30, 271-275 (1994)
13. Bucks, D. A. W, Maibach, H. I., Guy, R. I., Occlusion does not uniformly enhance Penetration in vivo, in: Percutaneous Absorption. Mechanisms - Methodology - Drug Delivery, R. L. Bronaugh, H. I. Maibach (eds.), pp. 77-97. Marcel Dekker, New York (1989)
14. Emilson, A., Lindberg, M., Forslind, B., The Temperature Effect on in vitro Penetration of Sodium Lauryl Sulphate and Nickel Chloride through Human Skin. Acta Dermatol Venereol. 73, 203-207 (1993)
15. Grunewald, A. M., Gloor, M., Gehring, W. et al., Damage to the Skin by Repetitive Washing. Contact Dermatitis 32, 225-232 (1995)
16. Malten, K. E., Thoughts on Irritant Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 7, 238-247 (1981)
17. Lammintausta, K., Maibach, H. I., Wilson, D., Susceptibility to Cumulative and Acute Irritant Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 19, 84-90 (1988)
18. Wahlberg, I E., Maibach, H. I., Nonanoic Acid Irritation - A Positive Control at Routine Patch Testing? Contact Dermatitis 6, 128-130 (1980)
19. Lee, C. H., Maibach H. L, The Sodium Lauryl Sulphate Model: An Overview. Contact Dermatitis 33, 17 (1995)
20. Miyazawa, K., Ogawa, M., Mitsui, T., The Physicochemical Properties and Protein Denaturation Potential of Surfactant Mixtures.Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 6, 33-46 (1984)
21. Clarys, P., Barel, A. O., Comparison of Three Detergents Using the Patch Test and the Hand/Forearm Immersion Test as Measurements of Irritancy. J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. 48, 141-149 (1997)
22. Held, E., Agner, T, Comparison between 2 Test Models in Evaluating the Effect of a Moisturizer on Irritated Human Skin. Contact Dermatitis 40, 261-268 (1999)
23. Paye, M., Games, G, Zerweck, C. R., et al., A Hand Immersion Test under Laboratory Controlled Usage Conditions: The Need for Sensitive and Controlled Assessment Methods. Contact Dermatitis 40, 133-138 (1999)
24. Charbonnier, Y, Morrsion, B. M., Jr., Paye M. et al., Open Application Assay in Investigation of Subclinical Irritant Dermatitis Induced by Sodium Lauryl Sulphate (SLS) in Man: Advantage of Squamometry. Skin Res. Technol. 4, 244-250 (1998)
25. Ohlenschlarger, J., Friberg, J., Ramsing, D. et al., Temperature Dependency of Skin Susceptibility to Water and Detergents. Acta Derm. Venereol. 76, 274-276 (1996)
26. Sugar, M., Schnetz, E., Fartasch, M., Does Sodium Lauryl Sulphate Concentration vary with Time? Contact Dermatitis 40, 146-149 (1999)
27. Nicholson, M., Willis, C. M., The Influence of Patch Test Size and Design on the Distribution of Erythema Induced by Sodium Lauryl Sulphate. Contact Dermatitis 41, 264-267 (1999)
28. Berardesca, E., Acute Irritant Dermatitis: Effect of Short-Term Topical Corticoid Treatment, in: Exogenous Dermatology, C. Surber, P. Elsner, A. Bircher (eds.), pp. 86-90. Karger, Basel (1995)