Differential diagnosis and non-surgical treatment of pelvic actinomycosis

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 79, Issue 11, 2000, Pages 1024-1025

  Nawroth, F ^a   Foth, D ^a   Schmidt, T ^a   Romer, T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Actinomycosis; Intrauterine device

Indexed keywords

AMPICILLIN; C REACTIVE PROTEIN; METRONIDAZOLE;

ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY; ACTINOMYCES ISRAELII; ACTINOMYCOSIS; ADULT; ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CURETTAGE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; LEUKOCYTE COUNT; LYMPHEDEMA; PELVIC INFLAMMATORY DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SALPINGOOOPHORECTOMY;

ACTINOMYCOSIS; ADULT; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAUTERINE DEVICES; PELVIS; PREGNANCY;

EID: 0033768936     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2000.0790111024.x     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Sieben falle schwerster schadigung durch intrauterinpessare (ein Fall von isolierter Genitalactinomykose)
2. Actinomyces in cervical smears of women using intrauterine contraceptive devices
3. 'Forgotten' intrauterine device leading to actinomycotic pyometra - 13 Years after menopause
4. Treatment strategy for pelvic actinomycosis: Case report and review of the literature
5. Pelvic actinomycosis - Is long-term antibiotic therapy necessary?