Caesarean sections at Queen Alia Military Hospital, Jordan: A six-year review

Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 41-45

  Akasheh, H F ^a   Amarin, V ^a  

^a Queen Alia Military Hospital   (Jordan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; JORDAN; MATERNAL AGE; MEDICAL AUDIT; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PARITY; PATIENT SELECTION; PREGNANCY; PUBLIC HOSPITAL; REOPERATION; STATISTICS; UNNECESSARY PROCEDURE; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HOSPITALS, MILITARY; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; JORDAN; MATERNAL AGE; MEDICAL AUDIT; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PARITY; PATIENT SELECTION; PREGNANCY; REOPERATION; UNNECESSARY PROCEDURES;

EID: 0033766039     PISSN: 10203397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Stafford RS et al. Trends in cesarean section use in California, 1983 to 1990. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1993, 168(4):1297-302.
2. Stembera Z. Vyvoj indikaci cisarskeho rezu v Ceske republice a nekterych vyspelych zemich. [Development of indications for cesarean section in the Czech republic and certain developed countries.] Casopis lekaru Ceskych, 1992, 131(8):225-30.
3. Tadesse E et al. Caesarean section deliveries at Tikur Anbessa Teaching Hospital, Ethiopia. East African medical journal, 1996, 73(9):619-22.
4. Leaphart WL et al. Labor induction with a prenatal diagnosis of fetal macrosomia. Journal of maternal-fetal medicine, 1997, 6(2):99-102.
5. Weeks JW et al. Gestational diabetes: does the presence of risk factors influence perinatal outcome? American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1994, 171(4):1003-7.
6. Diani F et al. Megalosomia fetale e modalita del parto. [Fetal macrosomia and mode of delivery.] Minerva ginecologica, 1995, 47(3):77-82.
7. Klingemann H et al. Der notfallmassige Kaiserschnitt - analyse von 143 notsectiones. [Emergency cesarean section - analysis of 143 emergency sections.] Geburtshilfe und frauenheilkunde, 1992, 52(2):96-102.
8. Chua S et al. Trial of labour after previous caesarean section: obstetric outcome. Australian and New Zealand journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 1989, 29(1):12-7.
9. Miller M and Leader LR. Vaginal delivery after caesarean section. Australian and New Zealand journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 1992, 32(3):213-6.
10. Lieberman E et al. The association of fetal sex with the rate of cesarean section. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1997, 176(3):667-71.
11. Hemminki E. Impact of caesarean section on future pregnancy - a review of cohort studies. Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology, 1996, 10(4):366-79.
12. Kline J, Arias F. Analysis of factors determining the selection of repeated caesarean section or trial of labour in patients with histories of prior caesarean delivery. Journal of reproductive medicine, 1993, 38(4):289-92.