The genetics of dietary experience in a restricted natural population

Psychological Science

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 69-72

  Burghardt, Gordon M ^a   Layne, Donna G ^a   Konigsberg, Lyle ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHEMORECEPTOR; DIET; ENVIRONMENT; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; ODOR; PHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY; SNAKE;

ANIMALS; CHEMORECEPTORS; COLUBRIDAE; DIET; ENVIRONMENT; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; PREGNANCY; SELECTION (GENETICS); SMELL;

EID: 0033765433     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00217     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Arnold, S.A. (1981). The microevolution of feeding behavior. In A. Kamil & T. Sargent (Eds.), Foraging behavior: Ecological, ethological, and psychological approaches (pp. 409-453). New York: Garland STPM.
2. Belew, R.K., & Mitchell, M. (Eds.). (1996). Adaptive individuals in evolving populations (Vol. 26). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Brodie, E.D., III, & Garland, T., Jr. (1993). Quantitative genetics of snake populations. In R.A. Seigel & J.T. Collins (Eds.), Snakes: Ecology and behavior (pp. 315-362). New York: McGraw-Hill.
4. Burghardt, G.M. (1969). Comparative prey-attack studies in newborn snakes of the genus Thamnophis. Behaviour, 33, 77-114.
5. Burghardt, G.M. (1970). Intraspecific geographical variation in chemical food cue preferences of newborn garter snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis). Behaviour, 36, 246-257.
6. Burghardt, G.M. (1993). The comparative imperative: Genetics and ontogeny of chemoreception in natricine snakes. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 41, 138-146.
7. Burghardt, G.M., & Krause, M.A. (1999). Plasticity of foraging behavior in garter snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis) reared on different diets. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 113, 277-285.
8. Burghardt, G.M., & Schwartz, J.M. (1999). Geographic variations on methodological themes from comparative ethology: A natricine snake perspective. In S.A. Foster & J.A. Endler (Eds.), Geographic diversification of behavior: An evolutionary perspective (pp. 69-94). New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Cooper, W.E., Jr., & Burghardt, G.M. (1990). A comparative analysis of scoring methods for chemical discrimination of prey by squamate reptiles. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 16, 45-65.
10. Ernst, C.H., & Barbour, R.W. (1989). Snakes of eastern North America. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University.
11. Falciglia, G.A., & Norton, P.A. (1994). Evidence for a genetic influence on preference for some foods. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 94(2), 154-158.
12. Gillingham, J.C., Rowe, J., & Weins, M.A. (1990). Chemosensory location and earthworm location by foraging eastern garter snakes, Thamnophis s. sirtalis. In D. McDonald, D. Müller-Schwarze, & S. Natynczuk (Eds.), Chemical signal in vertebrates (Vol. 5, pp. 522-532). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
13. Greenwell, M.G., Hall, M., & Sexton, O.J. (1984). Phenotypic basis for a feeding change in an insular population of garter snake. Developmental Psychobiology, 17, 457-463.
14. Gregory, P.T., & Nelson, K.J. (1991). Predation on fish and intersite variation in the diet of common garter snakes, Thamnophis sirtalis, on Vancouver Island. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 69, 988-994.
15. Hopper, J.L., & Mathews, J.D. (1982). Extensions to multivariate normal models for pedigree analysis. Annals of Human Genetics, 46, 373-383.
16. Lessells, C.M., & Boag, P.T. (1987). Unrepeatable repeatabilities: A common mistake. Auk, 104, 116-121.
17. Lyman-Henley, L.P., & Burghardt, G.M. (1995). Diet, litter, and sex effects on chemical prey preference, growth, and site selection in two sympatric species of Thamnophis. Herpetological Monographs, 9, 140-160.
18. Lynch, M., & Walsh, B. (1998). Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
19. McClearn, G.E., Johansson, B., Berg, S., Pedersen, N.L., Ahern, F., Petrill, S.A., & Plomin, R. (1997). Substantial genetic influence on cognitive abilities in twins 80 or more years old. Science, 276, 1560-1563.
20. Petrill, S.A., Plomin, R., Berg, S., Johansson, B., Pedersen, N.L., Ahern, F., & McClearn, G.E. (1998). The genetic and environmental relationship between general and specific cognitive abilities in twins age 80 and older. Psychological Science, 9, 183-189.
21. Plomin, R., Fulker, D.W., Corley, R., & DeFries, J.C. (1997). Nature, nurture, and cognitive development from 1 to 16 years: A parent-offspring adoption study. Psychological Science, 8, 442-447.
22. Plomin, R., & Hershberger, S. (1991). Genotype-environment interaction. In T.D. Wachs & R. Plomin (Eds.), Conceptualization and measurement of organism-environment interaction (pp. 29-43). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
23. Promislow, D.E.L., Tatar, M., Khazaeli, A.A., & Curtsinger, J.W. (1996). Age-specific patterns of genetic variance in Drosophila melanogaster: I. Mortality. Genetics, 143, 839-848.
24. Resnick, D.N., Shaw, F.H., Rodd, F.H., & Shaw, R.G. (1997). Evaluation of the rate of evolution in natural populations of guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Science, 275, 1934-1937.
25. Rossman, D.A., Ford, N.B., & Seigel, R.A. (Eds.). (1996). The garter snakes: Evolution and ecology. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
26. Schlichting, C.D., & Pigliucci, M. (1995). Gene regulation, quantitative genetics and the evolution of reaction norms. Evolutionary Ecology, 9, 154-168.
27. Schwartz, J.M., McCracken, G.F., & Burghardt, G.M. (1989). Multiple paternity in wild populations of the garter snake, Thamnophis sirtalis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 25, 269-273.
28. Scudder-Davis, R.M., & Burghardt, G.M. (1987). Diet and growth in juveniles of the garter snakes Thamnophis sirtalis infernalis and Thamnophis radix radix. Growth, 51, 74-85.
29. Segal, N.L., & Topolski, T.D. (1995). The genetics of olfactory perception. In R.L. Doty (Ed.), Handbook of clinical olfaction and gustation (pp. 323-343). New York: Marcel Dekker.
30. Shaw, R.G. (1987). Maximum-likelihood approaches applied to quantitative genetics of natural populations. Evolution, 41, 812-826.
31. Via, S., Gomulkiewicz, R., DeJong, G., Scheiner, S.M., Schlichting, C.D., & van Tiederen, P.M. (1995). Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: Consensus and controversy. Trends in Ecology und Evolution, 10, 212-214.
32. Wagner, A. (1996). Does evolutionary plasticity evolve? Evolution, 50, 1008-1023.
33. Wagner, G.P., & Altenberg, L. (1996). Perspective: Complex adaptations and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution, 50, 967-976.