The American Experience: Lessons Learned

Science and Engineering Ethics

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 95-107

  Rhoades, Lawrence J ^a  

^a Office of Research Integrity   (United States)

Author keywords

Research integrity; Research misconduct; Scientific integrity; Scientific misconduct

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GOVERNMENT; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LEGAL APPROACH; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OFFICE OF RESEARCH INTEGRITY; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; UNITED STATES; WHISTLEBLOWING;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; LEGAL APPROACH; OFFICE OF RESEARCH INTEGRITY; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; DISCLOSURE; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; FEDERAL GOVERNMENT; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; RESEARCH SUPPORT; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; TRUTH DISCLOSURE; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; WHISTLEBLOWING;

EID: 0033760103     PISSN: 13533452     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-000-0028-9     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. "Responsibility of PHS Awardee and Applicant Institutions for Dealing With and Reporting Possible Misconduct in Science," 42 C.F.R. Part 50, Subpart A, 54 Federal Register, 32446 (August 8, 1989).
2. Hallum, J. V. & Hadley, S. W. (1991) OSI: why, what, and how. ASM News 56: 647-650.
3. ORI Newsletter 6(2): 3 (March 1998).
4. ORI Newsletter 6(3): 3 (June 1998).
5. Office of Research Integrity (1999). Scientific Misconduct Investigations, 1993-1997, p. 10.
6. 42 C.F.R. §50.104 (a) (6)
7. Office of Research Integrity (1999). Scientific Misconduct Investigations, 1993-1997, p. 6.
8. 42 C.F.R. §50.105
9. Lubalin, J.S., Matheson, J.L., & Ardini, M.E. (1996). Survey of Accused but Exonerated Individuals in Research Misconduct Cases, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, N.C.
10. National Science Foundation (1990). Survey Data on the Extent of Misconduct in Science and Engineering, Office of Inspector General Oversight Study # 90-3214.
11. National Academy of Sciences (1992). Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process 1: 80-97, National Academy Press, Washington.
12. Lubalin, J. S. (1995). Consequences of Whistleblowing for the Whistleblower in Misconduct in Science Cases, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, N.C.
13. MSU officials criticized for mishandling data dispute (1993). Science 259: 592.
14. Office of Research Integrity (1998). Study of Inquiry Reports Not Submitted to ORI.
15. 42 C.F.R. §50.103 (d) (13)
16. Office of Research Integrity (1995). Guidelines for Institutions and Whistleblowers: Responding to Possible Retaliation against Whistleblowers in Extramural Research.