The Medical Research Council's Approach to Allegations of Scientific Misconduct

Science and Engineering Ethics

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 91-94

  Evans, Imogen ^a  

^a MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Deception; Fabrication; Falsification; Plagiarism; Scientific misconduct

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; ETHICS; LEGAL APPROACH; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL (GREAT BRITAIN); SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; SOCIAL CONTROL; UNITED KINGDOM;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; LEGAL APPROACH; MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL (GREAT BRITAIN);

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; ETHICS; GREAT BRITAIN; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; SOCIAL CONTROL, FORMAL;

EID: 0033759172     PISSN: 13533452     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-000-0027-x     Document Type: Article

References (2)

1. Kevles, D.J. (1998) The Baltimore Case: a trial of politics, science, and character. W.W Norton, New York and London.
2. Medical Research Council (1997) MRC Policy and Procedure for inquiring into Allegations of Scientific Misconduct. Medical Research Council, London.