The Effect of Familiarity on Distraction and Single Cue Use after Hippocampal Damage

Biological Research For Nursing

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 165-178

  Holden, Janean Erickson ^a   Therrien, Barbara ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Cue; disorientation; distraction; familiarity; hippocampus; wayfinding

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; CONFUSION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISEASE MODEL; HIPPOCAMPUS; INJURY; MALE; MAZE TEST; RANDOMIZATION; RAT; SENSORY DYSFUNCTION; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; TIME;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; ATTENTION; CONFUSION; CUES; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; HIPPOCAMPUS; MALE; MAZE LEARNING; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; SENSATION DISORDERS; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0033755098     PISSN: 10998004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/109980040000100302     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bellin C. 1990. Relocating adult day care: Its impact on persons with dementia. J Gerontol Nurs 16: 11-14.
2. Bird M, Alexopoulos P, Adamowicz. 1995. Success and failure in five case studies: Use of cued recall to ameliorate behaviour problems in senile dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 10: 305-311
3. Compton DM, Griffith HR, McDaniel WF, Foster RA, Davis BK. 1997. The flexible use of multiple cue relationships in spatial navigation: A comparison of water maze performance following hippocampal, medial septal, prefrontal cortex or posterior parietal cortex lesions. Neurobiol Learn Mem 68: 117-132.
4. Corkin S. 1984. Lasting consequences of bilateral medial temporal lobectomy: Clinical course and experimental findings in H.M. Semin Neurol 4: 249-259.
5. Coull JT, Nobre AC. 1998. Where and when to pay attention: The neural systems for directing attention to spatial locations and to time intervals as revealed by both PET and MRI. J Neurosci 18: 7426-7435.
6. DiMattia BD, Kesner RP. 1988. Spatial cognitive maps: Differential role of the parietal cortex and hippocampal formation. Behav Neurosci 102: 471-480.
7. Fremouw T, Jackson-Smith P, Kesner RP. 1997. Impaired place learning and unimpaired cue learning in hippocampal-lesioned pigeons. Behav Neurosci 111: 963-975.
8. Gage PD. 1985. Performance of hippocampectomized rats in a reference/working memory task: Effects of preoperative versus postoperative training. Physiol Psychol 13: 235-242.
9. Hall JF. 1956. The relationship between external stimulation, food deprivation and activity. J Comp Physiol Psychol 49: 339-341.
10. Heston LL, White J. 1991. The vanishing mind: A practical guide to Alzheimer's disease and other dementias. New York: WH Freeman.
11. Hetherington PA, Shapiro ML. 1997. Hippocampal place fields are altered by the removal of single visual cues in a distance dependent manner. Behav Neurosci 111: 20-34.
12. Holden JE, Therrien B. 1993. Cue familiarity reduces spatial disorientation following hippocampal damage. Nurs Res 42: 338-343.
13. Hughey DJ, Koppenaal RJ. 1987. Hippocampal lesions in rats alter learning about intramaze cues. Behav Neurosci 101: 634-643.
14. Jarrard LE, Okaichi H, Steward O, Goldschmidt RB. 1984. On the role of hippocampal connections in the performance of place and cue tasks: Comparisons with damage to hippocampus. Behav Neurosci 98: 946-954.
15. Kolb B, Walkey J. 1987. Behavioral and anatomical studies of the posterior parietal cortex in the rat. Behav Brain Res 23: 127-145.
16. Maguire EA, Burke T, Phillips J, Stauton H. 1996. Topographical disorientation following unilateral temporal lobe lesions in humans. Neuropsychologia 34: 993-1001.
17. Martin PD, O'Keefe J. 1998. Place field dynamics and directionality in a spatial memory task. Brain Res 783: 249-261.
18. Martino-Saltzman D, Blasch BB, Morris RD, McNeal LW. 1991. Travel behavior of nursing home residents perceived as wanderers and nonwanderers. Gerontologist 31: 666-672.
19. McNaughton BL, Barnes CA, O'Keefe J. 1983. The contributions of position, direction and velocity to single unit activity in the hippocampus of the freely moving rat. Exp Brain Res 52: 41-49.
20. Means LW, Douglas RJ. 1970. Effects of hippocampal lesions on cue utilization in spatial discrimination in rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol 73: 254-260.
21. Morris RGM, Garrud P, Rawlins JNP, O'Keefe J. 1982. Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions. Nature 297: 681-683.
22. Nightingale F. 1969. Notes on nursing: What it is and what it is not. New York: Dover.
23. Keefe J, Nadel L. 1978. The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford: Clarendon.
24. Pigott S, Milner B. 1990. Memory for different aspects of complex visual scenes after right anterior temporal lobectomy. Soc Neurosci Abstr 16: 26-26.
25. Raphaelson AC, Isaacson RL, Douglas RJ. 1965. The effect of distracting stimuli on the runway performance of limbic damaged rats. Psychon Sci 3: 483-484.
26. Riddell WI, Rothblat LA, Wilson WA Jr. 1969. Auditory and visual distraction in hippocampectomized rats. J Comp Physiol Psych 67: 216-219.
27. Samsonovich A, McNaughton BL. 1997. Path integration and cognitive mapping in a continuous attractor neural network model. J Neurosci 17: 5900-5920.
28. Savé E, Buhot M-C, Foreman N, Thinus-Blanc C. 1992. Exploratory activity and response to a spatial change in rats with hippocampal or posterior parietal cortical lesions. Behav Brain Res 47: 113-127.
29. Schenk F, Morris RGM. 1985. Dissociation between components of spatial memory in rats after recovery from the effects of retro-hippocampal lesions. Exp Brain Res 58: 11-28.
30. Scoville WB, Milner B. 1957. Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 20: 11-21.
31. Seigal AW. 1981. The externalization of cognitive maps in children and adults: In search of ways to ask better questions. In: Liben LS, Patterson AH, Newcombe, N, editors. Spatial representation and behavior across the life span. New York: Academic Press. p 167-194.
32. Speakman A, O'Keefe J. 1990. Hippocampal complex spike cells do not change their place fields if the goal is moved within a cue controlled environment. Eur J Neurosci 2: 544-555.
33. Swanson LW, Kohler C, Bjorkland A. 1987. The limbic region. 1: The septohippocampal system. In: Bjorkland A, Hokfelt T, Swanson LW, editors. Handbook of chemical neuroanatomy: Vol. 5. Integrated systems of the CNS part 1. New York: Elsevier. p 125-278.
34. Taube JS. 1998. Head direction cells and the neurophysiological basis for a sense of direction. Prog Neurobiol 55: 225-256.
35. Winocur G. 1982. Radial arm maze behavior by rats with dorsal hippocampal lesions: Effects of cueing. J Comp Physiol Psych 96: 155-169.
36. Xavier GF, Stein C, Bueno OFA. 1990. Rats with dorsal hippocampal lesions do react to new stimuli but not to spatial changes of known stimuli. Behav Neural Biol 54: 172-183.