|
Volumn 109, Issue 7, 2000, Pages 523-530
|
A comparison of cilostazol and pentoxifylline for treating intermittent claudication
a,h b c d e f f g
e
Annapolis MD
*
(United States)
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
CILOSTAZOL;
PENTOXIFYLLINE;
PLACEBO;
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DIARRHEA;
DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE;
DRUG EFFICACY;
DRUG SAFETY;
DRUG TOLERABILITY;
DRUG WITHDRAWAL;
FEMALE;
HEADACHE;
HEART PALPITATION;
HUMAN;
INTERMITTENT CLAUDICATION;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
MULTICENTER STUDY;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
TREADMILL EXERCISE;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
WALKING SPEED;
AGED;
DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD;
DRUG ADMINISTRATION SCHEDULE;
EXERCISE TEST;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
INTERMITTENT CLAUDICATION;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PENTOXIFYLLINE;
SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;
TETRAZOLES;
TIME FACTORS;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
VASODILATOR AGENTS;
WALKING;
|
EID: 0033754497
PISSN: 00029343
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9343(00)00569-6 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (397)
|
References (22)
|