Anaesthetists' attitudes to monitoring instrument design options

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 85, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 781-784

  Nazir, T ^a   Beatty, P C W ^b  

^a WITHINGTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anaesthetists, attitude to computers; Equipment, alarms; Equipment, safety; Monitoring, computerized

Indexed keywords

ALARM MONITOR; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ANESTHESIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; ANESTHESIST; ANESTHETIC EQUIPMENT; ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROL SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; ERGONOMICS; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT MONITORING; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; SAFETY;

EID: 0033754106     PISSN: 00070912     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bja/85.5.781     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. A preliminary survey into clinical attitudes to computer based decision support systems
2. User attitudes to computer-based decision support in anesthesia and critical care: A preliminary survey
3. Alarm Sounds for Medical Equipment in Intensive Care Areas and Operating Theatres
4. Aberdeen polygons: Computer displays of physiological profiles for intensive care
5. Human factors engineering guidelines and preferred practices for the design of medical devices
6. Response times to visual and auditory alarms during anaesthesia
7. Intelligent alarms reduce anesthesiologist's response time to critical faults