Comparing the efficacy of ranking methods for multiple round-robin tournaments

European Journal of Operational Research

Volumn 123, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 593-605

  Mendonca D ^a   Raghavachari, M ^a  

^a RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; GAME THEORY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBABILITY;

MULTIPLE ROUND-ROBIN TOURNAMENTS;

OPERATIONS RESEARCH;

EID: 0033747432     PISSN: 03772217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00110-1     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Bradley R.A. Some statistical methods in taste testing and quality evaluation. Biometrics. 9:1953;22-38.
2. Bradley R.A., Terry M.E. Rank analysis of incomplete block designs: I. The method of paired comparisons. Biometrika. 39:1952;324-345.
3. Cook W.D., Doyle J., Green R., Kress M. Ranking players in multiple tournaments. Computers and Operations Research. 23/9:1996;869-880.
4. Cook, W.D., Kress, M., 1992. Ordinal Information and Preference Structures. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
5. David, H.A., 1988. The Method of Paired Comparisons, 2nd ed., vol. 41. Oxford University Press, New York.
6. Kendall M.G. Further contributions to the theory of paired comparisons. Biometrics. 11:1955;43-62.
7. Mallows C.L. Non-null ranking models: I. Biometrika. 44:1957;114-130.
8. Marden, J.I., 1995. Analyzing and Modeling Rank Data, vol. 64. Chapman & Hall, New York.
9. McGarry T., Schutz R.W. Efficacy of traditional sport tournament structures. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 48:1997;65-74.
10. Moon, J.W., 1968. Topics on Tournaments. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
11. Sachs, L., 1984. Applied Statistics (Zenon Reynarowych, Trans.), 2nd ed. Springer, New York.
12. Vol'skii V.I. Choice of best alternatives on directed graphs and tournaments. Avtomatika i Telemekhanika. 3:1988;3-17.
13. Wei, T.H., 1952. The Algebraic Foundations of Ranking Theory. Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.