Exploring the implications of allocation of function for human resource management in the Royal Navy

International Journal of Human Computer Studies

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 319-334

  Strain, John ^a   Eason, Ken ^b  

^a Gregory Harland Ltd   (United Kingdom)

^b LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; WARSHIPS;

FUNCTION ALLOCATION; HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT;

MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS;

EID: 0033745838     PISSN: 10715819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/ijhc.1999.0291     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. BAINBRIDGE, L. (1987). Ironies of automation. In J. RASMUSSEN, K. D. DUNCAN & J. LEPLAT, Eds. New Technology and Human Error. Chichester: Wiley.
2. CARROLL, J. M. Ed. (1995). Scenario-Based Design: Envisioning Work and Technology in System Development. New York: Wiley.
3. CORBRIDGE, C. & COOK, C. A. (1997). The role of function allocation in the design of future naval systems. In E. F. FALLON, I. BANNON & J. MCCARTHY, Eds. ALLFN'97: Revisiting the Allocation of Functions Issue, pp. 73-88. Louisville, KY, IEA Press.
4. EASON, K. D. (1988). Information Technology and Organisational Change. London: Taylor and Francis.
5. EASON, K. D., HARKER, S. D. P. & OLPHERT, C. W. (1996). Representing socio-technical systems options in the development of new forms of work organization. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 399-420.
6. EASON, K. D., HARKER, S. D. P. & OLPHERT, C. W. (1997). Working with users to generate organisational requirements: the ORDIT methodology. ICL Systems Journal, 11, 205-222.
7. EASON, K. D. & OLPHERT, C. W. (1996). Early evaluation of the organisational implications of CSCW systems. In P. THOMAS, Ed. CSCW Requirements and Evaluation, pp. 75-89. London: Springer.
8. FITTS, P. M. (1951). Human Engineering for an Effective Air Navigation and traffic Control System. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
9. FLEISHMAN, E. A. & MUMFORD, M. D. (1988). Ability requirement scales. In S. GAEL, Ed. The Job Analysis Handbook for Business, Industry and Government, Vol. 2. New York: Wiley.
10. FLEISHMAN, E. A. & QUAINTANCE, M. K. (1984). Taxonomies of Human Performance: The Description of Human Tasks. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
11. MARSH, G. G. W. & STAFFORD, A. J. (1975). The impact of automation upon warship design - the total system concept. Proceedings of the Ship Control Systems Conference. The Hague, Netherlands, October.
12. OLDER, M. T., WATERSON, P. E. & CLEGG, C. W. (1997). A critical assessment of task allocation methods and their applicability. Ergonomics, 40, 151-171.
13. OLPHERT, C. W. & HARKER, S. D. P. (1994). The ORDIT method for organisational requirements definition. In G. E. BRADLEY, & H. W. HENDRICK, Eds. Human Factors in Organisational Design and Management, Vol. 4, pp. 421-426. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
14. OTTO, E., VISSER, K. & WOLFF, P. A. (1997). Application of function analysis in naval platform automation specification. In P. A. WILSON, Ed. Eleventh Ship Control Systems Symposium, pp. 353-364. Southampton: Computational Mechnanics Publications.
15. PREECE, D. A. (1995). Organizations and Technical Change: Strategy, Objectives and Involvement. London: Routledge.
16. STRAIN, J. D. (1991). A harder approach to soft systems. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 123-132.