Formulae describing subjective attributes for sound fields based on a model of the auditory-brain system

Journal of Sound and Vibration

Volumn 232, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 101-127

  Ando, Y ^a   Sakai, H ^a   Sato, S ^a  

^a KOBE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC WAVE REFLECTION; CORRELATION METHODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SUBJECTIVE TESTING;

AUDITORY BRAIN SYSTEM; HUMAN CEREBRAL HEMISPHERES;

AUDITION;

EID: 0033743225     PISSN: 0022460X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.1999.2687     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. ANDO Y. Concert Hall Acoustics. 1985;Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.
2. ANDO Y., YAMAMOTO K., NAGAMATSU H., KANG S. H. Auditory brainstern response (ABR) in relation to the horizontal angle of sound incidence. Acoustic Letters. 15:1991;57-64.
3. ANDO Y., KANG S. H., NAGAMATSU H. On the auditory-evoked potential in relation to the IACC of sound field. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan. 8:1987;183-190.
4. ANDO Y., KANG S. H., MORITA K. On the relationship between auditory-evoked potential and subjective preference for sound field. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan. 8:1987;197-204.
5. ANDO Y., CHEN C. On the analysis of autocorrelation function of α -waves on the left and right cerebral hemispheres in relation to the delay time of single sound reflection. Journal of Architecture, Planning and Environmental Engineering (Transaction of AIJ). 488:1996;67-73.
6. CHEN C., ANDO Y. On the relationship between the autocorrelation function of the α -waves on the left and right cerebral hemisphere and subjective preference of the reverberation time of music sound field. Journal of Architecture, Planning and Environmental Engineering (Transaction of AIJ). 489:1996;73-80.
7. NISHIO K., ANDO Y. On the relationship between the autocorrelation function of the continuous brain waves and the subjective preference of sound field in change of the IACC. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 100:1996;2787.
8. ANDO Y. Architectural Acoustics - Blending Sound Sources, Sound Fields and Listeners. 1998;AIP Press/Springer-Verlag, New York.
9. KATSUKI Y., SUMI T., UCHIYAMA H., WATAHABE T. Electric responses of auditory neurons in cat to sound stimulation. The Journal of Neurophysiology. 21:1958;569-588.
10. DAMASKE P., ANDO Y. Interaural crosscorrelation for multichannel loudspeaker reproduction. Acustica. 27:1972;232-238.
11. NAKAJIMA T., ANDO Y. Effects of a single reflection with varied horizontal angle and time delay on speech intelligibility. The Journal of Acoustical Society of America. 90:1991;3173-3179.
12. ANDO Y., KURIHARA Y. Nonlinear response in evaluating the subjective diffuseness of sound field. The Journal of Acoustical Society of America. 80:1986;833-836.
13. SINGH P. K., ANDO Y., KURIHARA Y. Individual subjective diffuseness responses of filtered noise sound fields. Acustica. 80:1994;471-477.
14. SATO S., ANDO Y. Effects of interaural crosscorrelation function on subjective attributes. The Journal of Acoustical Society of America. 100:1996;2592.
15. ANDO Y. Subjective preference in relation to objective parameters of music sound fields with a single echo. The Journal of Acoustical Society of America. 62:1977;1436-1441.
16. KANG S. H., ANDO Y. Comparison between subjective preference judgements for sound fields by different nations. Memoirs of Graduate School of Science and Technology, Kobe University. 3-A:1985;71-76.
17. SERAPHIM H. P. Ueber die Wahrnehmbarkeit mehrerer Rueckwuerfe von Sprachshall. Acustica. 11:1961;80-91.
18. HAAS H. Ueber den Einfluss eines Einfachechos auf die Hoersamkeit von Sprache. Acustica. 1:1951;49-58.
19. ANDO Y., SHIDARA S., MAEKAWA Z. Simulation of sound propagation with boundary and subjective test. Proceedings of the 8th International Congress of Acoustics. 1974;611.
20. ANDO Y., ALRUZ H. Perception of coloration in sound fields in relation to the autocorrelation function. Journal of Acoustic Society of America. 71:1982;616-618.
21. NAKAYAMA I. Preferred time delay of a single reflection for performers. Acustica. 54:1984;217-221.
22. SATO S., ANDO Y., OTA S. Subjective preference of cellists for the delay time of a single reflection in a performance. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 1999.
23. MOURI K., AKIYAMA K., ANDO Y. Relationship between subjective preference and the α -brain wave in relation to the initial time delay gap with vocal music. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 1999.
24. ATAGI J., ANDO Y., UEDA Y. On the effects of time-variant sound fields on subjective preference. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 1999.
25. SAKAI H., ANDO Y., SETOGUCHI H. Individual subjective preference of listeners to vocal music sources in relation to the subsequent reverberation time of sound fields. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 1999.
26. ANDO Y., SATO S., SAKAI H. Fundamental Subjective Attributes of Sound Fields Based on the Model of Auditory-Brain System. Sendra J. J. Computational Acoustics in Architecture. 1999;WIT Press, Southampton.
27. SCHOUTEN J. F. Plomp R., Smoorenburg G. F. Frequency Analysis and Periodicity Detection in Hearing, Leiden, Sijithoff, The Residue Revisited. 1970;41-58.
28. I. Gde. N. MERTHAYASA, Y. ANDO, Unpublished, Variation in the autocorrelation function of narrow-band noises: their effect on loudness judgement.
29. WIGHTMAN F. L. The pattern-transformation model of pitch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 54:1973;407-416.
30. HOUTGAST T., STEENEKEN H. J. M., PLOMP R. Predicting speech intelligibility in rooms from the modulation transfer function. I. General room acoustics. Acustica. 46:1980;60-72.
31. KORENAGA Y., ANDO Y. A method of calculating intelligibility of sound field in relation to temporal structure of reflections - on the trend of syllable confusion under sound fields composed of a direct sound and up to two reflections (in Japanese). The Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan. 52:1996;940-947.
32. SHODA T., ANDO Y. Calculation of speech intelligibility using four orthogonal factors extracted from the autocorrelation function of source and sound field signals, which is cited in Table 4. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress on Acoustics, Seattle. 1998;2163-2164.