Time to collision from first-order spherical image motion

Robotics and Autonomous Systems

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 5-15

  Colombo, Carlo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; CONFORMAL MAPPING; CONSTRAINT THEORY; IMAGE SENSORS; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; ROBOTICS;

ACTIVE CONTOURS; FIRST ORDER IMAGE MOTION; SCALED DEPTH; TIME TO COLLISION;

COMPUTER VISION;

EID: 0033743039     PISSN: 09218890     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8890(99)00077-9     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bouthemy P., François E. Motion segmentation and qualitative dynamic scene analysis from an image sequence. International Journal of Computer Vision. 10(2):1993;157-182.
2. Campani M., Verri A. Motion analysis from first-order properties of optical flow. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing: Image Understanding. 56(1):1992;90-107.
3. R. Cipolla, A. Blake, Surface orientation and time to contact from image divergence and deformation, in: Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer Vision ECCV'92, 1992, pp. 187-202.
4. C. Colombo, Time to collision from a natural perspective, Technical Report RT-199703-11, Dipartimento di Elettronica per l'Automazione, Brescia, Italy, April 1997.
5. Colombo C., Kruse E., Dario P. Control of camera motions from the planning of image contours. Robotics and Autonomous Systems. 16:1995;29-38.
6. Colombo C., Rucci M., Dario P. Attentive behavior in an anthropomorphic robot vision system. Robotics and Autonomous Systems. 12:1994;121-131.
7. Giachetti A., Torre V. The use of optical flow for the analysis of non-rigid motions. International Journal of Computer Vision. 18(3):1996;255-279.
8. J.J. Gibson, The Perception of the Visual World, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA, 1950.
9. Heeger D.J., Jepson A.D. Subspace methods for recovering rigid motion I: algorithm and implementation. International Journal of Computer Vision. 7(2):1992;95-117.
10. M. Kemp, The Science of Art. Optical Themes in Western Art from Brunelleschi to Seurat, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 1990.
11. Koenderink J.J., van Doorn A.J. Invariant properties of the motion parallax field due to the movement of rigid bodies relative to an observer. Optica Acta. 22:1975;773-791.
12. Longuet-Higgins H.C., Prazdny K. The interpretation of a moving retinal image. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. 208:1980;385-397.
13. Nelson R.C., Aloimonos J. Obstacle avoidance using flow field divergence. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 11(10):1989;1102-1106.
14. Regan D. Visual processing of four kinds of relative motion. Vision Research. 26:1986;127-145.
15. Sandini G., Tagliasco V. An anthropomorphic retina-like structure for scene analysis. Computer Graphics and Image Processing. 14(3):1980;365-372.
16. R. Sharma, Active vision in robot navigation: Monitoring time-to-collision while tracking, in: Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS'92, 1992, pp. 2203-2208.
17. Subbarao M. Bounds on time-to-collision and rotational component from first-order derivatives of image flow. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing. 50:1990;329-341.
18. Tistarelli M., Sandini G. Dynamic aspects in active vision. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing: Image Understanding. 56(1):1992;108-129.
19. Tistarelli M., Sandini G. On the advantages of polar and log-polar mapping for direct estimation of time-to-impact from optical flow. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 15(4):1993;401-410.
20. E. Trucco, A. Verri, Introductory Techniques to 3D Computer Vision, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1998.