Formalizing guidelines for the design of screen layouts

Displays

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 3-15

  Ngo, D C L ^a   Teo, L S ^a   Byrne, J G ^b  

^a MULTIMEDIA UNIVERSITY   (Malaysia)

^b TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER GRAPHICS; GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES;

INTERFACE AESTHETICS;

DISPLAY DEVICES;

EID: 0033738097     PISSN: 01419382     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0141-9382(00)00026-3     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Maquet J. The Aesthetic Experience. 1986;Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
2. Foley J.D., van Dam A., Feiner S.K., Hughes J.F. Computer Graphics: Principles and Practice. 2nd ed. 1990;Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
3. Marcus A. Graphic Design for Electronic Documents and User Interfaces. 1992;ACM Press, New York.
4. Tractinsky N. Aesthetics and Apparent Usability: Empirically Assessing Cultural and Methodological Issues. CHI '97 Conference Proceedings. 1997;Association for Computing Machinery, New York.
5. Kurosu M., Kashimura K. Apparent Usability vs. Inherent Usability. CHI '95 Conference Companion. 1995;Association for Computing Machinery, New York.
6. S.C. Toh, Cognitive and motivational effects of two multimedia simulation presentation modes on science learning, PhD dissertation, University of Science Malaysia, Malaysia, 1998.
7. Aspillaga M. Screen design: a location of information and its effects on learning. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction. 18:(3):1991;89-92.
8. Szabo M., Kanuka H. Effects of Violating Screen Design Principles of Balance, Unity and Focus on Recall Learning, Study Time, and Completion Rates. ED-Media/ED-Telecom 98 Conference Proceedings. 1998;Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, Charlottesville, VA.
9. Heines J. Screen Design Strategies for Computer-Assisted Instruction. 1984;Digital Press, Bedford, MA.
10. Grabinger R.S. Computer screen designs: viewer judgements. Educational Technology Research and Development. 41:(2):1991;35-73.
11. Tullis T.S. An evaluation of alphanumeric, graphic, and colour information displays. Human Factors. 23:1981;541-550.
12. T.S. Tullis, Predicting the usability of alphanumeric displays, PhD Dissertation, Rice University, Houston, TX, 1984.
13. Keister R.S., Gallaway G.R. Making Software User Friendly: an Assessment of Data Entry Performance. HFS 27th Annual Meeting Proceedings. 1983;Human Factors Society, Santa Monica, CA.
14. Tullis T.S. Screen Design. Helander M. Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. 1988;377-411 Elsevier, Amsterdam.
15. Streveler D.J., Wesserman A.I. Quantitative Measures of the Spatial Properties of Screen Designs. INTERACT '84 Conference Proceedings. 1984;North Holland, Amsterdam.
16. Sears A. Layout appropriateness: guiding user interface design with simple task descriptions. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 19:(7):1993;707-719.
17. D.C.L. Ngo, Visit: visitor information system implementation Tool, PhD dissertation, Trinity College, Dublin, 1994.
18. Ngo D.C.L., Byrne J.G. Aesthetic Measures for Screen Design. OZCHI '98 Conference Proceedings. 1998;IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA.
19. D.C.L. Ngo, A. Samsudin, R. Abdullah, in preparation.
20. Arlov L. GUI Design for Dummies. 1997;IDG Books Worldwide, Foster City, CA.
21. Arnheim R. Art and Visual Perception. 1954;University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
22. Dondis D.A. A Primer of Visual Literacy. 1973;The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
23. Galitz W.O. The Essential Guide to User Interface Design: an Introduction to GUI Design Principles and Techniques. 1997;Wiley, New York.
24. Reilly S.S., Roach J.W. Improved visual design for graphics display. CG & A. 002:1984;42-51.
25. Bonsiepe G. A method of quantifying order in typographic design. Journal of Typographic Research. 2:1968;203-220.