Modified iterated simulated annealing algorithm for structural synthesis

Advances in engineering software

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 391-400

  Pantelides, C P ^a   Tzan, S R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CONSTRAINT THEORY; DYNAMIC LOADS; ITERATIVE METHODS; RANDOM PROCESSES; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIMULATED ANNEALING; STRESS ANALYSIS;

TIME VARYING GLOBAL DISPLACEMENT;

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0033737797     PISSN: 09659978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0965-9978(00)00007-7     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Taylor J. Optimal design of structural systems: an energy formulation. AIAA J. 7:1969;1404-1406.
2. Prager W, Marcal P. Optimality criteria in structural design. AFFDL-TR-70-166, Air Force Flight Dynamics Lab, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, 1971.
3. Kiusalaas, J. Minimum weight design of structures via optimality criteria. NASA TND-7115, NASA, Washington, DC, 1972.
4. Khot N.S., Berke L., Venkayya V.B. Comparison of optimal criteria: algorithms for minimum weight design of structures. AIAA J. 17:(2):1979;182-190.
5. Venkayya V. Design of optimum structures. J Comp Struct. 1:(1/2):1971;265-309.
6. Gellatly RA, Berke L, Optimal structural design. AFFDL-TR-70-165, Air Force Flight Dynamics Lab, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, 1971.
7. Dobbs M.W., Nelson R.B. Application of optimality criteria to automated structural design. AIAA J. 14:(10):1976;1436-1443.
8. Fleury C. An efficient optimality criteria approach to the minimum weight design of elastic structures. J Comput Struct. 11:1980;163-173.
9. Gellatly R.A., Gallagher R.H. A procedure for automated minimum weight structural design. Aeronaut Quarterly. 17:(3):1966;216-230.
10. Hsieh C.C., Arora J.S. Design sensitivity analysis and optimization of dynamic response. Comp Meth Appl Mech Engng. 43:1984;195-219.
11. Greene W.H., Haftka R.T. Computational aspects of sensitivity calculations in linear transient analysis. Struct Optimization. 3:1991;176-201.
12. Heldenfels RR, Automating the design process: progress, problems, prospects, potential. AIAA, Paper 73-353, March, 1973.
13. Vanderplaats G.N. An efficient feasible directions algorithm for design synthesis. AIAA J. 22:(11):1984;1633-1640.
14. Vanderplaats GN. Research and Development, Inc. DOT Users Manual. Version 4.20, Colorado Springs, Colorado, 1995.
15. Kelley H.J. The cutting plane method for solving complex programs. SIAM J. 8:1960;703-712.
16. Vanderplaats G.N. Numerical optimization techniques for engineering design: with applications. 1984;McGraw-Hill, New York.
17. Schmit L.A., Farshi B. Some approximation concepts for structural synthesis. AIAA J. 12:1974;692-699.
18. Schmit L.A., Fleury C. Structural synthesis by combining approximation concepts and dual methods. AIAA J. 18:1980;1252-1260.
19. Zienkiewicz O.C., Campbell J.S. Shape optimization and sequential linear programming. Ghallagher R.H., Zienkiewicz O.C. Optimum structural design. 1973;Wiley, New York.
20. Storashli O.O., Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J. On the accuracy of the Taylor approximation for structure resizing. AIAA J. 12:1974;231-233.
21. Starnes J.H., Haftka R.T. Preliminary design of composite wings for buckling, strength, and displacement constraints. J Aircraft. 16:1979;564-570.
22. Braibant V., Fleury C. An approximation concepts approach to shape optimal design. Comp Meth Appl Mech Engng. 53:1985;119-148.
23. Svanberg K. The method of moving asymptotes-a new method of structural optimization. Int J Num Meth Engng. 24:1987;359-373.
24. Goldberg E.D. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. 1989;Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
25. Davis L. Handbook of genetic algorithms. 1991;Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
26. Michalewicz Z. Genetic algorithms - data structures=evolution programs. 2 :1992;Springer, Berlin.
27. DeJong K.A. Genetic algorithms: a 25 year perspective. Zurada J.M., Marks R.M., Robinson C.J. Computational intelligence - imitating life. 1994;125-134 IEEE Press, New York.
28. Sandgren E. Multicriteria design optimization by goal programming. Adeli H. Advances in design optimization. 1994;225-265 Chapman and Hall, London.
29. Kirkpatrick S., Gellatt C.D. Jr, Vecchi M.P. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science. 220:(4598):1983;671-680.
30. Ackley D.H. An empirical study of bit vector function optimization. Lawrence D. Genetic algorithms and simulated annealing. 1987;170-271 Morgan Kauffmann, Los Altos, CA.
31. Salama M, Bruno R, Chen G-S, Garba J. Optimal placement of excitations and sensors by simulated annealing. In: Proc. NASA/Air Force Symposium on Recent Experiences in Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, 1988.
32. Chen G.-S., Bruno R.J., Salama M. Optimal placement of active/passive members in truss structures using simulated annealing. AIAA J. 29:(8):1991;1327-1334.
33. Balling R.J. Optimal steel frame design by simulated annealing. J Struct Engng. 117:(6):1991;1780-1795.
34. Lin C.-Y., Jiang J.-F. Optimum design with multimodal simulated annealing strategies. Hernandez S., El-Sayed M., Brebbia C.A. Fourth international conference on computer aided optimum design of structures. 1995;109-117 Computational Mechanics Publication, Southampton.
35. Hajela P., Berke L. Neural networks in structural analysis and design: an overview. Computing Syst Engng. 3:1992;525-538.
36. Bland J.A. Discrete-variable optimal design using a tabu search approach. Hernandez S., El-Sayed M., Brebbia C.A. Fourth international conference on computer aided optimum design of structures - OPTI95. 1995;59-66 Computational Mechanics Publication, Southampton.
37. Fox R.L., Kapoor M.P. Structural optimization in the dynamics response regime: a computational approach. AIAA J. 8:1970;1798-1804.
38. Cassis JH. Optimum design of structures subjected to dynamic loads. Rep., UCLA-ENG-7451, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of California at Los Angeles, CA, 1974.
39. Johnson E.H. Disjoint design spaces in the optimization of harmonically excited structures. AIAA J. 14:(2):1976;259-261.
40. Johnson E.H., Rizzi P., Ashley H., Segenreich S.A. Optimization of continuous one-dimensional structures under steady harmonic excitation. AIAA J. 14:(12):1976;1690-1698.
41. Cassis J.H., Schmit L.A. Jr. Optimal structural design with dynamic constraints. J Struct Div ASCE. 102:(10):1976;2053-2071.
42. Feng T.-T., Arora J.S., Haug E.J. Optimal structural design under dynamic loads. Int J Num Meth Engng. 11:1977;39-52.
43. Haug E.J., Arora J.S. Applied optimal design. 1979;Wiley, New York.
44. Yamakawa H. Optimum structural designs for dynamic response. Kagsdell K.M., Zienkiewicz O.C. New directions in optimum structural design. 1984;249-266 Wiley, New York.
45. Mills-Curran W.C., Schmit L.A. Structural optimization with dynamic behavior constraints. AIAA J. 23:(1):1985;132-138.
46. Tseng C.H., Arora J.S. Optimum design of systems for dynamics and controls using sequential quadratic programming. AIAA J. 27:1989;1793-1800.
47. Thomas H.L., Schmit L.A. Jr. Control-augmented structural synthesis with dynamic stability constraints. AIAA J. 29:(4):1991;619-626.
48. Choi K.K., Wang S. Design sensitivity analysis of dynamics of built-up structures using Ritz and mode acceleration methods. Rozvany G.I.N. Optimization of large structural systems. NATO AIS Series. I:1993;313-328 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dortrecht.
49. Bucher I., Braun S. Efficient optimization procedure for minimizing vibratory response via redesign or modification. Part I. Theory. J Sound Vibr. 175:1994;433-453.
50. Bucher I., Braun S. Efficient optimization procedure for minimizing vibratory response via redesign or modification. Part II. Examples. J Sound Vibr. 175:1994;455-473.
51. Chahande A.I., Arora J.S. Optimization of large structures subjected to dynamic loads with the multiplier method. Int J Num Meth Engng. 37:1994;413-430.
52. ICBO, International Conference of Building Officials. Uniform Building Code 2;1994, Whittier, CA, 2.362.
53. Guyan R.J. Reduction of stiffness and mass matrices. AIAA J. 3:(2):1965;380.
54. Tzan S.-R., Pantelides C.P. Annealing strategy for optimal structural design. J Struct Engng. 122:(7):1996;815-827.
55. Pantelides CP, Tzan S-R. Synthesis of passive and active bracing in active structures. Report UUCE 96-01, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, NTIS Accession no. PB96-191465, 1996.
56. Pantelides CP, Tzan S-R. Modified iterated simulated annealing method: MISA user guide. NISEE Software Library, 2nd ed., PEER, Richmond, CA, 2000.