Japan's leadership role in East Asian security multilateralism: The Nakayama proposal and the logic of reassurance

Pacific Review

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 367-397

  Midford, Paul ^a  

^a KANAZAWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

ASEAN Post Ministerial Conference; ASEAN Regional Forum; Balance of threat theory; Multilateralism; Nakayama Taro; Reassurance

Indexed keywords

FOREIGN POLICY; INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS; LEADERSHIP; REGIONAL SECURITY;

ASIA; JAPAN;

EID: 0033731961     PISSN: 09512748     EISSN: 14701332     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09512740050147924     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. ASEAN-ISIS (1991) A Time For Initiative: Proposals for the Consideration of the Fourth ASEAN Summit, ASEAN Institutes of Strategic and International Studies.
2. Baker, James A. (1991) ‘America in Asia: emerging architecture for a Pacific community’, Foreign Affairs 70(5): 1-18.
3. Buzan, Barry (1988) ‘Japan’s future: old history versus new roles’, International Affairs 64(4): 557-73.
4. Buzan, Barry (1995) ‘Japan’s defense problematique’, The Pacific Review 8(1): 25-43.
5. Chittiwatanapong, Prasert (1993) ‘Japan’s roles in the posthegemonic world: perspectives from Southeast Asia’, in Frank Langdon and Tsuneo Akaha (ed.) Japan in the Posthegemonic World, Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner, pp. 214-19.
6. Heinrich, L. William Jr. (1997) Seeking An Honored Place: The Japanese self-defense Forces and the Use of Armed Force Abroad, Department of Political Science: Columbia University, Ph.D. dissertation.
7. Jervis, Robert (1976) Perception and Misperception in International Politics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8. Jervis, Robert (1978) ‘Cooperation under the Security Dilemma’, World Politics 30(January): 167-214.
9. Katzenstein, Peter J. (1996) Cultural Norms and National Security: Police and Military in Post-war Japan, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
10. Kawasaki, Tsuyoshi ‘Between realism and idealism in Japanese security policy: The case of the ASEAN regional forum’, Pacific Review 10(4).
11. Kristof, Nicholas D. (1998) ‘The Problem of Memory’, Foreign Affairs 77(6): 37-49.
12. Kuriyama, Takakazu (1990) ‘Gekido no 90 nenndai to Nihon gaiko no shinntenkai: Atarashii Kokusai Chitsujyoh Kennchiku e no Sekkyokuteki Kohken no tame ni’, Gaiko Forum 20 (May).
13. Layne, Christopher (1993) ‘The unipolar illusion: why new great powers will rise’, International Security 17(4): 5-51.
14. Leifer, Michael (1996) The ASEAN Regional Forum (Adelphi Paper 302), London: International Institute for Strategic Studies, p. 41.
15. Lindskold, Svenn (1978) ‘Trust Development, the GRIT Proposal, and the Effects of Conciliatory Acts on Conflict and Cooperation’, Psychological Bulletin 85: 772-93.
16. Lu, Pei-chun (1991) ‘Ajia kara mita “Kaigai Hahei” Mondai’, in Nobuo Miyajima Kazumi Kenmochi and Akio Yamakawa (ed.) Wangan Sensoh to Kaigai Hahei [The Gulf War and Foreign Deployment], Tokyo: Ryokufu, pp. 121-34.
17. Lu, Pei-chun (1993) Ajia kara Mita Nihon no ‘Kokusai Kouken’, Tokyo: Rodohko Junbousya.
18. Manglapus, Raul (1976) Japan in Southeast Asia: A Collision Course, New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
19. Mercer, Jonathan (1996) Reputation and International Politics, Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
20. Midford, Paul (1997) ‘Making the most of a bad reputation: reassurance strategies in Japan’s security policy’, Social Science Japan 11 (November).
21. Midford, Paul (1998) ‘The role of reputation in international politics: The cases of Japan and Russia’, Kanazawa Law Review 40(2): 1-58.
22. Ministry of Foreign Affairs (1991a) Diplomatic Bluebook 1991: Japan’s Diplomatic Activities, Tokyo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Japan.
23. Ministry of Foreign Affairs (1991b) Japan’s Post Gulf International Initiatives, Tokyo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Japan.
24. Ministry of Foreign Affairs (1992) Diplomatic Bluebook 1992: Japan’s Diplomatic Activities, Tokyo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Japan.
25. Nakamura, Fujiro (1991) Ajia no shimbun ga hojita Jieitai no ‘kaigai hahei’, Tokyo: Nashinokisha.
26. Nakayama, Taro (1995) Futatsu no haisen kokka: nihon to doitsu no goju nen [Two Defeated Countries: Japan and Germany After 50 Years], Tokyo: Yomiuri Shinbun Sha.
27. Nishihara, Masashi (1987) ‘Japan, A Power Misperceived in Southeast Asia’, in Frances Fung, Wai Lai and Charles E. Morrison (ed.) Political and Security Cooperation: A New Dimension in ASEAN-Japan Relations, Tokyo: Japan Center for International Exchange, pp. 85-101.
28. Nishihara, Masashi (1988) Senryaku Kenkyu no Shikaku: Heiwa to Anzen no tame no Jyuni Sho, Tokyo: Ningen no Kagakusha.
29. Nishihara, Masashi (1994) ‘Ajia-taiheiyo chiiki to takokukan anzen hosho kyoryoku no wakugumi: ASEAN chiiki forumu wo chyuushin ni’, Kokusai Mondai 415(October): 60-68.
30. Orr, Robert (1990) The Emergence of Japan’s Foreign Aid Power, New York: Columbia University Press.
31. Pyle, Kenneth B. (1992) The Japanese Question: Power and Purpose in A New Era, Washington, DC: The American Enterprise Institute Press.
32. Ruggie, John G. (1994) ‘Multilateralism Matters: The anatomy of an institution’, in John G. Ruggie (ed.) Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 3-49.
33. Satoh, Yukio (1991) ‘Asian Pacific Process for Stability and Security’, in Japan Ministry of Foreign Affairs (ed.) Japan’s Post Gulf International Initiatives, Manila: Japan Ministry of Foreign Affairs, pp. 34-45.
34. Satoh, Yukioh (1994) ‘1995 nen no fushime ni mukaate: Ajia-Taiheyoo chiki no anzen hoshyoo’, Gaiko Forum 64 (January): 12-18.
35. Satoh, Yukioh (1995) ‘Emerging trends in Asia-Pacific security: The role of Japan’, Pacific Review 8(2): 267-81.
36. Smith, Charles (1990) ‘Cold War worriers: Japan reluctant to face changing security order’, Far Eastern Economic Review December 13, p. 27.
37. Soeya, Yoshihide (1993) ‘Japan’s Policy towards Southeast Asia: Anatomy of ‘Autonomous Diplomacy’ and the American Factor’, in Chandran Jeshurun (ed.) China, India, Japan and the Security of Southeast Asia, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
38. Sudo, Sueo (1992) The Fukuda Doctrine and ASEAN: New Dimensions in Japanese Foreign Policy, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
39. Takagi, Seiichiro (1997) ‘Chugoku to Ajia Taiheiyo no Takokukan Anzennhosho Kyoryoku’, Kokusai Mondai 442(January): 53-67.
40. Takeda, Isami (1992) ‘Anzenhoshoh Daiarogu no Teishyoh-Nihon ni totte ASEAN to Oseania’, Gaiko Forum 49(October): 16-26.
41. Tomiyama, Yasushi (1992) ‘Prime Minister Miyazawa’s proposal: doubts about his Asian security plan’, Chuoh Kohron 107(1288): 78-9.
42. Walt, Stephen M. (1987) The Origins of Alliances, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
43. Weinstein, Martin E. (1971) Japan’s Post-war Defense Policy, 1947-1968, New York: Columbia University Press.
44. Welfield, John (1988) An Empire in Eclipse: Japan in the Post-war American Alliance System, London and Atlantic Highlands, NJ: The Athlone Press.
45. Yasutomo, Dennis T. (1986) The manner of giving: strategic aid and Japanese foreign policy, Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.
46. Youtz, David and Midford, Paul (1992) A Northeast Asian Security Regime: Prospects After The Cold War, New York: Institute for East West Studies.