The use of performance-based simulation tools for building design and evaluation: A Singapore perspective

Building and Environment

Volumn 35, Issue 8, 2000, Pages 709-736

  Hien, Wong Nyuk ^a   Poh, Lam Khee ^a   Feriadi, Henry ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

PERFORMANCE-BASED SIMULATION TOOLS;

BUILDINGS;

EID: 0033721737     PISSN: 03601323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0360-1323(99)00059-1     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Tham K.W. Intelligent buildings - concept, technology and perceptions. Professional Builder Singapore. 6:(4):1992;3-10.
2. Tu K.J., Loftness V. The effects of organisation workplace dynamics and building infrastructure flexibility on environmental and technical quality in offices. Journal of Corporate Real Estate. 1:(1):1998;46-63.
3. Hartkopf V, Loftness V, Mill P. The concept of total building performance and building diagnostics. ASTM Special Technical Publication - Building performance: function, preservation, and rehabilitation. STP 1986. p. 5-22.
4. Mahdavi A., Lam K.P. Performance simulation as a front-end tool for integrative conceptual design evaluation. Proceedings of the Second International Conference of the International Building Performance Simulation Association (IBPSA), France. 1991;185-192.
5. Johnson R., Clayton M. The impact of information technology in design and construction: the owner's perspective. Automation in Construction. 8:1998;3-14.
6. ISO. Product data representation and exchange. Part 1: Overview and fundamental, STEP Document ISO TC184/SC4/PMAG, 1992.
7. Augenbroe G. Integrated building performance evaluation in the early design stages. In Build. Envrion. 27:(2):1992;149-161.
8. Pohl J., Reps I. An integrated intelligent CAD environment. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Systems Research, Informatics and Cybernatics. Baden-Baden, Germany. 1988.
9. Mahdavi A., Mathew P., Lee S., Rohini B., Chang S., Kumar S., Liu G., Ries R., Wong N.H. On the structure and elements of SEMPER. Proceedings of the 1996 ACADIA conference. Tuscon, Arizona. 1996;71-84.
10. Mahdavi A., Emre M., Mathew P., Ries R., Suter G. Aspects of S2. Proceedings of the CAAD futures '99 Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 1999.
11. Mahdavi A. Computational decision support and the building delivery process: a necessary dialogue. Automation in Construction. 7:1998;205-211.
12. Chang W., Lim B., Williamson J. Fire legislation reform and the architect. The Royal Australian Institute of Architects (Queensland Chapter) Seminar, October, 1998. 1998.
13. Hatton T. Problems of the prescriptive, in fire code reform. National Seminar Series: Performance-based approach to building fire safety design. August, Adelaide, 1996.
14. Beck V. Performance-based fire engineering design and its application in Australia. Fire safety Science - Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium of the International Association of Fire Safety Science. 1997;23-40.