Information transfer and fidelity in quantum copiers

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 61, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 062304-062301

  Deuar, P ^a   Munro, W J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COPYING; DECODING; ENCODING (SYMBOLS); MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; OPTIMIZATION; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; VECTORS;

BLOCK CODING SCHEME; FIDELITY; INFORMATION TRANSFER; QUANTUM COPYING MACHINE; SHANNON INFORMATION;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 0033717451     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. W. K. Wootters and W. H. Zurek, Nature (London) 299, 802 (1982).
2. D. Dieks, Phys. Lett. 92A, 271 (1982).
3. V. Bužek and M. Hillery, Phys. Rev. A 54, 1844 (1996).
4. R. Jozsa, J. Mod. Opt. 41, 2315 (1994).
5. H. Barnum, C. M. Caves, C. A. Fuchs, R. Jozsa, and B. Schumacher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2818 (1996).
6. N. G. B. Huttner, Phys. Lett. A 228, 13 (1997).
7. N. Gisin and S. Massar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2153 (1997).
8. D. Bruß , D. DiVincenzo, A. Ekert, C. A. Fuchs, C. Macchiavello, and J. A. Smolin, Phys. Rev. A 57, 2368 (1998).
9. N. Gisin, Phys. Lett. A 242, 1 (1998).
10. Lu-Ming Duan and Guang-Can Guo, Phys. Lett. A 243, 261 (1998).
11. N. J. Cerf, Acta Phys. Slov. 48, 115 (1998).
12. V. Bužek, M. Hillery, and B. Rednik, Acta Phys. Slov. 48, 177 (1998).
13. R. F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A 58, 1827 (1998).
14. V. Bužek, M. Hillery, and P. L. Knight, Fortschr. Phys. 46, 521 (1998).
15. M. Murao, D. Jonathan, M. B. Plenio, and V. Vedral, Phys. Rev. A 59, 156 (1999).
16. C. E. Shannon, Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379 (1948); 27, 623 (1948).
17. C. E. Shannon, Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379 (1948); 27, 623 (1948).
18. iρ̂] [19].
19. A. S. Holevo, Probl. Inf. Transm. 9, 110 (1973).
20. C. M. Caves and P. D. Drummond, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 481 (1994).
21. P. Hausladen, R. Jozsa, B. Schumacher, M. Westmoreland, and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A 54, 1869 (1996).
22. A. S. Holevo, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 44, 269 (1998).
23. Lu-Ming Duang and Guang-Can Guo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4999 (1998).
24. m is of no physical significance and thus can take any value, all of which lead to an information content of zero, anyway.
25. C. A. Fuchs, Fortschr. Phys. 46, 535 (1998).
26. As well as a "dummy" input state of Hubert space dimension 2, which is always in the same state initially. This is needed to preserve unitarity of the transformation.