Abstracts produced using computer assistance

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 51, Issue 8, 2000, Pages 745-756

  Craven, Timothy C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER APPLICATIONS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; CORRELATION METHODS;

SOFTWARE PACKAGE TEXNET;

ABSTRACTING;

EID: 0033715324     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:8<745::AID-ASI70>3.0.CO;2-Z     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. American National Standards Institute. (1979). American national standard for writing abstracts (ANSI Z39.14-1979). New York: ANSI.
2. Boser, J.A., et al. (1991). Gender differences: Let's see them in writing (ERIC document ED341980).
3. Burgin, R., & Dillon, M. (1992). Improving disambiguation in FASIT. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(2), 101-114.
4. Calvert, D., & Calvert, H. (1999). MACREX HOME PAGE [On-line]. Available: http://www.macrex.cix.co.uk/.
5. Craven, T.C. (1988). Text network display editing with special reference to the production of customized abstracts. Canadian Journal of Information Science, 13(2), 59-68.
6. Craven, T.C. (1991a). Use of words and phrases from full text in abstracts. Journal of Information Science, 16, 351-358.
7. Craven, T.C. (I991b). Algorithms for graphic display of sentence dependency structures. Information Processing and Management, 27(6), 603-613.
8. Craven, T.C. (1993). A computer-aided abstracting tool kit. Canadian Journal of Information Science, 18(2), 19-31.
9. Craven, T.C. (1996). An experiment in the use of tools for computer-assisted abstracting. In ASIS 96: Proceedings of the 59th ASIS Annual Meeting 1996 (volume 33). Baltimore, MD: October 21-24, 1996 (pp.203-208). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
10. Craven, T.C. (1998). Human creation of abstracts with selected computer-assistance tools. Information Research, 3(4), paper 47 [On-line], Available: http://www.shef.ac.uk/~is/publications/infres/paper47.html.
11. Craven, T.C. (in press). Presentation of repeated phrases in a computer-assisted abstracting tool kit. Information Processing and Management.
12. Endres-Niggemeyer, B. (1994). Summarizing text for intelligent communication: Results of the Dagstuhl Seminar. Knowledge Organization, 21(4), 213-223.
13. Endres-Niggemeyer, B., Waumans, W., & Yamashita, H. (1991). Modelling summary writing by introspection: a small-scale demonstrative study. Text, 11(4), 523-552.
14. Facan, J.L. (1989). The effectiveness of a nonsyntactic approach to automatic phrase indexing for document retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(2), 115-132.
15. Indexing Research. (1998). Indexing Research: CINDEX [On-line]. Available: http://www.indexres.com/cindex.html.
16. Jones, L.P., Gassie, E.W., & Radhakrishnan, S. (1990). INDEX: The statistical basis for an automatic conceptual phrase-indexing system. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(2), 87-97.
17. Kaplan, R.B., Cantor, S., Hagstrom, C., Kamhi-Stein, L.D., Shiotani, Y., & Zimmerman, C.B. (1994). On abstract writing. Text, 14(3), 401-426.
18. Kozma, R.B. (1991). The impact of computer-based tools and embedded prompts on writing processes and products of novice and advanced college writers. Cognition and Instruction, 8(1), 1-27.
19. Martinez, C., Lucey, J., & Linder, E. (1987). An expert system for machine-aided indexing. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 27(4), 158-162.
20. Nielsen, J. (1994). Estimating the number of subjects needed for a thinking aloud test. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 41, 385-397.
21. Paice, C. (1990). Constructing literature abstracts by computer: Techniques and prospects. Information Processing and Management, 26(1), 171-186.
22. Paice, C.D. (1994). Automatic abstracting. In: A. Kent & C.M. Hall (Eds.), Encyclopedia of library and information science (volume 53, supplement 16, pp. 16-27). New York: Dekker.
23. Paijmans, H. (1993). Comparing the document representations of two IR systems: CLARIT and TOPIC. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 44(7), 383-392.
24. Pitkin, R.M., Branagan, M.A., & Burmeister, L.F. (1999). Accuracy of data in abstracts of published research articles. JAMA, 281(12), 1110-1 111.
25. R & TU Inc. (1994). WinSpell 3.0 user's manual and reference. Cedar Rapids, IA: R & TH Inc.
26. Salager-Meyer, F. (1991). Medical English abstracts: How well are they structured? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(7), 528-531.
27. Simpson, E.H. (1949). Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163, 688.
28. SKY Software. (1998). Product information [On-line]. Available: http:// www.sky-software.com/prodinfo.htm.
29. SPSS Inc. (1993). SPSS for windows, release 6.0 (June 17 1993).
30. SPSS Inc. (1998). SPSS for windows, release 8.0.2 (23 Sept. 1998).
31. Tibbo, H.R. (1992). Abstracting across the disciplines: A content analysis of abstracts from the natural sciences, the social sciences, and the humanities with implications for abstracting standards and online information retrieval. Library and Information Science Research, 14(1), 31-56.
32. Van Dijk, T., & Kintsch, W. (1985). Cognitive psychology and discourse: Recalling and summarizing stories. In: H. Singer & R.B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (3rd ed., pp.794-812). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.