Current utilization of CASE technology: Lessons from the field

Industrial Management and Data Systems

Volumn 100, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 22-30

  McMurtrey, Mark E ^a   Teng, James T C ^b   Grover, Varun ^b   Kher, Hemant V ^c  

^a FRANCIS MARION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c University of South Carolina Sumter   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; SURVEYS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT;

COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 0033707477     PISSN: 02635577     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/02635570010273027     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Banker, R.D. and Kauffman, R. J. (1991), "Reuse and productivity in integrated computer-aided software engineering: an empirical study", Management Information Systems Quarterly, Vol. 15 No. 3, September, pp. 375-401.
2. Bellin, D. (1991), "Information commodities and the production process: how the introduction of CASE tools affects the software development process", unpublished doctoral dissertation, The City University of New York, New York, NY.
3. Card, D.N., McGarry, F.E. and Page, G.T. (1987), "Evaluating software engineering technologies", IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. SE-13 No. 7, July, pp. 845-51.
4. du Plessis, A.L. (1993), "A method for CASE tool evaluation", Information and Management, Vol. 25, pp. 93-102.
5. Freeman, E. (1997), "Is object oriented application development worth the cost?", Datamation, Vol. 43 No. 3, pp. 82-6.
6. Freeman, R. J. (1992), "An empirical study of the linkage of CASE, function points, and systems development", in Forte, G., Madhavi, N.A. and Muller, H.A. (Eds), Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Computer-Aided Software Engineering, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, pp. 254-7.
7. Hayley, K.J. and Lyman, H.T. (1990), "The realities of CASE", Journal of Information Systems Management, Vol. 7 No. 3, Summer, pp. 18-23.
8. Henderson, J.C. and Cooprider, J.G. (1990), "Dimensions of I/S planning and design aids: a functional model of CASE technology", Information Systems Research, Vol. 1 No. 3, September, pp. 227-54.
9. Ho, Y. (1992), "To what extent will CASE tools assist users in the systems development? - A case study in academic environment", in Lederer, A.L. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1992 ACM SIGCPR Conference, ACM Press, Cincinnati, OH, pp. 93-6.
10. Johnson, R.A. and Hardgrave, W.C. (1997), "Evaluation of object-oriented systems design (OOSD): opinions, cases and empirical research", Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute, San Diego, CA (in press).
11. Loh, M. and Nelson, R.R. (1989), "Reaping CASE Harvests", Datamation, 1 July, pp. 31-4.
12. McClure, C. (1989), "The CASE experience", Byte, Vol. 14 No. 4, April, pp. 235-44.
13. McMurtrey, M.E. (1997), "Determinants of job satisfaction among systems professionals: an empirical study of the impact of CASE tool usage and career orientations", unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
14. Necco, C.R., Tsai, N.W. and Holgeson, K.W. (1989), "Current usage of CASE software", Journal of Systems Management, Vol. 40 No. 5, May, pp. 6-11.
15. Nelson, A.C. (1991), The Effects of CASE Tools and Systems Development Methodology on Systems Analysts, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh, PA.
16. Norman, R. J. (1987), "Integrated development environments in support of information systems design methodologies and systems analysts' productivity", unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona. Tuscon, AZ.
17. Norman, R.J. and Nunamaker, J. (1989), "CASE productivity perceptions of software engineering professionals", Communications of the ACM, Vol. 32 No. 9, September, pp. 1102-8.
18. Ongkasuwan, M. (1991), "An investigation of the effects of computer-aided software engineering tools, system complexity, and systems analyst's experience on the system design quality and productivity: a laboratory experiment", unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University. Atlanta, GA.
19. Post, G., Kagan, A. and Keim, R.T. (1997), "Object-oriented (OO) CASE tools: an evaluation of ROSE", Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute, San Diego, CA, (in press).
20. Rai, A. (1991), "Stimulating the use of computer-aided software engineering in information systems departments: an empirical test of elements of innovation theory", unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kent State University. Kent, OH.
21. Selamat, M.H., Choong, C.Y., Othman, A.T. and Rahim, M.M. (1994), "Non-use phenomenon of CASE tools: Malaysian experience", Information and Software Technology, Vol. 36, No. 9, pp. 531-7.
22. Stamps, D. (1987), "CASE: cranking out productivity", Datamation, 1 July, pp. 55-8.
23. Subramanian, G.H. and Zarnich, G.E. (1996), "An examination of some software development effort and productivity determinants in ICASE tool projects", Journal of Management Information Systems, Spring, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 143-60.
24. Vessey, I., Jarvenpaa, S.I. and Tractinsky, N. (1992), "Evolution of vendor products: CASE tools as methodology companions", Communications of the ACM, April, Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 90-105.
25. Wu, S. and Wu, M.S. (1994), Systems Analysis and Design, West Publishing Company, St. Paul, Minneapolis.
26. Zagorsky, C. (1990), "Case study: managing the change to CASE", Journal of Information Systems Management, Vol. 7, No. 3, Summer, pp. 24-32.