Forward and backward flow of technology: The relationship between foreign suppliers and domestic technological advance

Technovation

Volumn 20, Issue 8, 2000, Pages 403-412

  Craig, Steven G ^a   Degregori, Thomas R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY; COSTS; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS;

TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE;

TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

EID: 0033705759     PISSN: 01664972     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0166-4972(00)00008-0     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Adams W., Dirlam J.B. Steel imports and vertical oligopoly power. American Economic Review. 54(5):1964;626-655.
2. Adams W., Dirlam J.B. Big steel, invention and innovation. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 80(2):1966;167-189.
3. Ayres C.E. The Theory of Economic Progress. 1944;University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
4. Baxter, A., 1994. Just in time to fuel the debate. Financial Times, London, August 10.
5. Bennet, J., 1994. Detroit struggles to learn another lesson from Japan: Chrysler has come the farthest in working closely with its suppliers. The New York Times, June 19.
6. Bessant J., Caffyn S., Gilbert J., Harding R., Webb S. Rediscovering continuous improvement. Technovation: The International Journal of Technological Innovation and Entrepreneurship. 14(1):1994;17-29.
7. Burkhardt F.H. The Cleavage in our Culture: Essays in Scientific Humanism in Honor of Max Otto. 1952;Beacon Press, Boston.
8. DeGregori T.R. Technology and The Economic Development of the Tropical African Frontier. 1969;Case Western Reserve University Press, Cleveland, Ohio.
9. DeGregori T.R. A Theory of Technology: Continuity and Change in Human Development. 1985;Iowa State University Press.
10. DeGregori, T.R., 1985b. Technology transfer: a problem solving process. A Consultant Report to US. AID, May.
11. Dinopoulos E., Kreinin M.E. Effects of the U.S.-Japan auto VER on European prices and on U.S. welfare. Review of Economics and Statistics. 70(August):1988;484-491.
12. Done, K., 1994. The challenge is clear: Change or die. Financial Times Survey: World Automotive Components. Financial Times, London, July 12.
13. Farrington B. Greek Science. 1944;Penguin Books, London.
14. Farrington B. Head and Hand in Ancient Greece. 1947;Studies In The Social Relations Of Thought, London.
15. Feenstra R.C. Automobile prices and protection: The US.-Japan trade resistant. Journal of Policy Modeling. VII(November):1985;49-68.
16. Fuss M.A., Waverman L. Costs and productivity in automobile production: The Challenge of Japanese efficiency. 1992;Cambridge University Park, New York.
17. Lorenz, C., 1994. Learn the lessons of history. Financial Times, London, June 17.
18. Mckinsey Global Institute, 1993. Study on Manufacturing Productivity.
19. Minchinton W.E. The British Tinplate Industry. 1957;Clarendon Press, Oxford.
20. Purcell C.W. Jr. Tariff and technology: the American tinplate industry. Technology and Culture. 3(3):1962;267-284.
21. Rosseger G. Steel imports and vertical monopoly power: comment. American Economic Review. 7(3):1967;431-443.
22. Utterback J.M. Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation: How Companies Can Seize Opportunities in the Face of Technological Change. 1994;Harvard Business School Press, Boston (MA).
23. Veblen T. Imperial Germany and the Industrial Revolution. 1954;Viking Press, New York.
24. Blind intersection? Policy and the automobile industry. 1987;The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.