Fatigue performance of adhesively bonded connections in GRE pipes

International Journal of Fatigue

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 513-519

  Knox, E M ^a   Cowling, M J ^a   Hashim, S A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE JOINTS; AGING OF MATERIALS; BENDING (DEFORMATION); BONDING; GLASS FIBER REINFORCED PLASTICS; LOADS (FORCES); PIPE;

POLYMER MATRIX COMPOSITE; STRUCTURAL FATIGUE TESTS;

FATIGUE TESTING;

EID: 0033704135     PISSN: 01421123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0142-1123(00)00015-3     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Kinloch A.J. Kinloch A.J. Durability of structural adhesives, chapter 1. 1983;Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, London.
2. Maddison A. Long term evaluation of structural adhesive joints in real conditions. Proc. SAEV, Bristol, Inst. of Materials. 1998;68-73.
3. Cowling MJ, Hashim SA, Winkle IE, Lafferty S. Structural integrity of bonded connections between polymer composite components in marine applications. In: Cost Effective Use of Fibre Reinforced Composites Offshore, Phase III, Final Report 1994-1996, 1996.
4. Frost SR. Designing composite pipelines for use in the oil industry. Proc. Composite Materials for Offshore Use, 1994.
5. Knox EM, Cowling MJ, Hashim SA. Creep analysis of adhesively bonded connections in GRE pipes including the effect of defects. Submitted to Composites A. May 1999.
6. Kujawski D. Width effects on the tensile strength and fatigue behaviour of angle ply laminates. Int. J. Fatigue. 20(8):1998;575-580.
7. BS 7159: 1989. British standard code of practice for design and construction of glass reinforced plastics (GRP) piping systems for individual plants or sites. BSI 1989.
8. Ma A, Bellamy MJ, Williams SP. New test data on structural behaviour of GRE pipe and joint systems. In: OMAE Volume V, Pipeline Technology ASME, 1995;329-344.
9. Frost SR. The fatigue performance of glass fibre/epoxy matrix filament wound pipes. Proc. ICCM/9 Madrid, 1993;684-691.
10. Ameron. Test report, Test no. MP3/9848-89, Ameron Bv, Geldermalsen, 1989.
11. Bai J., Seeleuthner P., Bompard P. Mechanical behaviour of ±55° filament-wound glass-fibre/epoxy-resin tubes: I. Microstructural analyses, mechanical behaviour and damage mechanisms of composite tubes under pure tensile loading, pure internal pressure, and combined loading. Composites Science and Technology. 57:1997;141-153.
12. Health and Safety Executive. Proposed revisions to fatigue guidance. August 1993, Issued for comment, 1993.
13. Loudon G. Private Communication, The Met. Office Johnson House, London Road, Bracknell, Berkshire, UK, 1999.
14. Gilmore RB, Shaw SJ. The effect of temperature and humidity on the fatigue behaviour of composite bonded joints. In: Composite Bonding ASTM STP 1227. Damico DJ, Wilkinson TL Jr, Niks SLF, editors. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia. 1984;82-95.
15. Bowditch M.R. The durability of adhesive joints in the presence of water. Int. J. Adhesion and Adhesives. 16(2):1996;73-79.
16. Hahn HT. Fatigue of composites: Environmental effects. Proc. of 3rd Riso Int. Symposium on Metallurgy and Material Science. 1982;19-35.
17. Kinloch A.J. The service life of adhesive joints, chapter 8. Adhesion and adhesives science and technology. 1987;Chapman and Hall, London.
18. Smith GD, Fay P. Creep of adhesive lap joints in dry and high humidity environments. Proc. Adhesion'90, Cambridge, The Plastics and Rubber Institute. 1990;25/1-25/7.
19. Knox EM, Cowling MJ, Hashim SA. Creep analysis of adhesive joints for composite components. Proc. SAEV, Bristol, Inst. of Materials. 1998;104-112.
20. Yu H, Adams RD, Karachalios VF. Cure shrinkage in epoxy adhesives. Proc. EURADH'96 ADHESION'96 Cambridge. 1996;509-514.