An explicit integration method for realtime simulation of multibody vehicle models

Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

Volumn 187, Issue 1-2, 2000, Pages 337-350

  Bae, D S ^a   Lee, J K ^a   Cho, H J ^a   Yae, H ^b  

^a Hanyang University   (South Korea)

^b Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology (SAIT)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CONSTRAINT THEORY; CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS; DYNAMICS; EQUATIONS OF MOTION; INTEGRATION; KINEMATICS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; RAILROAD CARS; TIRES;

JACOBIAN MATRIX; MULTIBODY VEHICLE MODEL; NEWTON CHORD METHOD; POWERTRAIN MODEL; REALTIME SIMULATION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

EID: 0033690387     PISSN: 00457825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00138-3     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. J. Drosdol, F. Panik, The Daimler-Benz Driving Simulator: A tool for Vehicle Development, SAE paper (1985) 850334.
2. J.S. Freeman, G. Watson, Y.E. Papelis, T.C. Lin, A. Tayyab, R.A. Romano, J.G. Kuhl, The Iowa Driving Simulator: An Implementation and Application Overview, SAE paper (1995) 950174.
3. F.A. Potra, W.C. Rheinboldt, On the numerical solution of Euler-Lagrange equations, NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Real-Time Integration Methods for Mechanical System Simulation, Snowbird, Utah, USA, 1989.
4. J. Yen, E.J. Haug, F.A. Potra, Numerical method for constrained equations of motion in mechanical system dynamics, Technical Report R-92, Center for Simulation and Design Optimization, Department of Mechanical Engineering, and Department of Mathematics, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, 1990.
5. García de Jalón D.J., Unda J., Avello A. Natural coordinates for the computer analysis of multibody systems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 56:1986;309-327.
6. Bayo E., García de Jalón J., Avello A., Cuadrado J. An efficient computational method for real time multibody dynamic simulation in fully cartesian coordinates. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 92:1991;377-395.
7. J. Wittenburg, Dynamics of Systems of Rigid Bodies, B.G. Teubner, Stuttgart, 1977.
8. R. Schwertassek, Reduction of multibody simulation time by appropriate formulation of dynamical system equations, Computer-Aided Analysis of Rigid and Flexible Mechanical Systems, NATO ASI Series, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1993, pp. 447-482.
9. P.E. Nikravesh, G. Gim, Systematic construction of the equations of motion for multibody systems containing closed kinematic loops, J. Mech. Design, 115 (6) (1993) 143-149.
10. Featherstone R. The calculation of robot dynamics using articulated-body inertias. Int. J. Roboics Res. 2:1983;13-30.
11. D.S. Bae, E.J. Haug, A recursive formulation for constrained mechanical system dynamics: Part II. closed loop systems, Mech. Struct. Machines 15 (4) (1987) 481-506.
12. K. Changizi, A.A. Shabana, A recursive formulation for the dynamic analysis of open loop deformable multibody systems, J. Appl. Mechanics 55 (1988) 687-693.
13. G. Gim, J. Krishnasamy, P.E. Nikravesh, An analytical model of pneumatic tires for vehicle dynamic simulations, Int. J. Vehicle Design, 11-12 (1990).
14. Cho D., Hedrick J.K. Automotive train modeling for control. Trans. ASME J. of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control. 111:1989;568-576.
15. C.T. Kelley, Iterative Methods for Linear and Nonlinear Equations, SIAM press, 1995.