Ethical issues in transgenics

Cloning

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 137-144

  Sherlock, Richard ^a   Morrey, John D ^b  

^a Department of Animal Dairy and Veterinary Sciences   (United States)

^b UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLONING; EVOLUTION; GENE TECHNOLOGY; GENETIC ENGINEERING; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; POLICY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC OPINION; REVIEW;

ANIMAL WELFARE; ANIMALS; ANIMALS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; BIOETHICAL ISSUES; BIOETHICS; CLONING, ORGANISM; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENETIC TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; PUBLIC OPINION; TRANSGENES;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0033680380     PISSN: 15204553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/152045500750039842     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. Bach, F.H., Fishman, J., Daniels, N., Proimos, S., Anderson, B., Carpenter, Cv Forrow, L., Robson, S., and Fineben, H. (1998). Uncertainty in xenotransplantation: Individual benefit vs. collective risk. Nat. Med. 4,141-144.
2. Greenpeace. (1999). www.greenpeace.org
3. Hillman, B. (1995). "Views differ sharply over benefits, risks of agricultural biotechnology." Chemical and Engineering News, August 8-17.
4. Ho, M.W. (2000). Genetic Engineering: Dream or Nightmare (Continuum Publishers, New York, NY).
5. Institute of Medicine. (1996). Xenotransplantation: Science, Ethics, and Public Policy. (National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.).
6. Krimsky, S. (1982). Genetic Alchemy: The Social History of the Recombinant DNA Controversy. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
7. Levin, M., and Strauss, H. (1990). Risk Assessment in Genetic Engineering. (McGraw Hill Publishers, New York, NY).
8. Linzey, A. (1995). Animal Theology. (University of Illinois Press, Champaign, IL).
9. Regan, T., and Singer, P., eds. (1989). Animal Rights and Human Obligations. (Prentice Hall Publishers, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
10. USA (2000). USA Today, January 4, 2000.
11. Wiggins, D. (1980). Sameness and Substance. (Blackwells Publishers, Oxford, UK).