Reflections on methodological issues in mental health research

Journal of Mental Health

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 463-470

  Richardson, A ^a   Baker, M ^a   Burns, T ^a   Lilford, R J ^a   Muijen, M ^a  

^a NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; EDITORIAL; MENTAL HEALTH; METHODOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESEARCH;

EID: 0033678803     PISSN: 09638237     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09638230020005192     Document Type: Editorial

References (26)

1. A comparison of observational studies and randomised controlled trials
2. High quality clinical databases: Breaking down the barriers
3. Choosing between randomised and non-randomised studies: A systematic review
4. Mental health care systems and their characteristics: A proposal
5. Mental health care failure in England: Myth and reality
6. Effects of case load size on the process of care of patients with severe psychotic illness
7. Qualitative medical sociology: What are its crowning achievements?
8. The PACE (population-adjusted clinical epidemiology) strategy: A new approach to multicentre clinical research
9. Failure in community care: Psychiatry's dilemma
10. Randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs
11. Ethical issues in the design and conduct of randomised controlled trials
12. Economic evaluation and mental health: Sparse past...fertile future?
13. Who's Afraid of Thomas Bayes? The Cochrane Lecture
14. Commissioning health services research: An iterative method
15. The efficacy of cognitive behaviour therapies: A quantitative review of the research evidence
16. Randomized trials or observational tribulations. Editorial
17. Qualitative data analysis for applied social research
18. Effectiveness research and implications for study design: Sample size and statistical power
19. Content and quality of 2000 controlled trials in schizophrenia over 50 years
20. Comparison of intensive and standard case management for patients with psychosis. Rationale of the trial
21. Intensive versus standard case management for severe psychotic illness: A randomised trial