Can we justify historical control groups when using animal models?

Annals of Emergency Medicine

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 622-624

  Angelos, Mark G ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL WELFARE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONTROL; DEFIBRILLATION; DISEASE MODEL; EDITORIAL; HEART ARREST; LAW; METHODOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESUSCITATION;

EID: 0033672341     PISSN: 01960644     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mem.2000.111061     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Immediate countershock versus cardiopulmonary resuscitation before countershock in a 5-minute swine model of ventricular fibrillation arrest
2. Monophasic versus biphasic transthoracic countershock after prolonged VF in a swine model
3. Use of historical controls for animal experiments
4. A comparison of randomized concurrent control groups with matched historical control groups: Are historical controls valid?
5. Data analysis: Statistical analysis and use of historical control data