|
|
Volumn 78, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 642-646
|
|
″With the rule″ astigmatism is not the rule in the elderly
|
|
Author keywords
Aging; Astigmatism; Hyperopia; Keratometry; Myopia; Population based study; Refraction
|
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
AGED;
AGING;
ARTICLE;
ASTIGMATISM;
AUTOMATION;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DATA ANALYSIS;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
HYPERMETROPIA;
KERATOMETRY;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
MASS SCREENING;
MYOPIA;
PATIENT SELECTION;
POPULATION RESEARCH;
PREVALENCE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
REFRACTION ERROR;
REFRACTOMETRY;
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;
VISION TEST;
VISUAL ACUITY;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
EYE REFRACTION;
ICELAND;
MIDDLE AGED;
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;
PHYSIOLOGY;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
AGED;
AGED, 80 AND OVER;
AGING;
ASTIGMATISM;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
HYPEROPIA;
ICELAND;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
MYOPIA;
PREVALENCE;
REFRACTION, OCULAR;
VISUAL ACUITY;
|
|
EID: 0033671407
PISSN: 13953907
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2000.078006642.x Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (104)
|
|
References (15)
|
