New insights into the appraisal of flood-alleviation benefits: (2) The broader context

Water and Environment Journal

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 354-362

  Penning Rowsell, E C ^a   Green, C ^a  

^a MIDDLESEX UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Benefit cost analysis; Design standards; Flood alleviation; Public perception

Indexed keywords

RAIN;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; FLOOD CONTROL; FLOOD DAMAGE;

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; DISASTER; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; INVESTMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECREATION; TOPOGRAPHY; WATER MANAGEMENT;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0033665583     PISSN: 17476585     EISSN: 17476593     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-6593.2000.tb00273.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Penning-Rowsell, E. C. and Green, C. H. New insights into the appraisal ot flood alleviation benefits (1): flood damage and flood loss information. J. Wal. & Envir. Mangt., 2000, 14, 0, 000.
2. Penning-Rowsell, E. C. and Chatterton, J. B. The Benefits of Flood Alleviation: A Manual of Assessment Techniques. Gower Technical Press/Saxon House, Aldershot, UK, 1977.
3. Middlesex University Flood Hazard Research Centre. Proposed Flood Alleviation Project for Pulborough, Sussex: Benefit Assessment. Middlesex University Flood Hazard Research Centre, London, 1975.
4. Penning-Rowsell, E. C., Chatterion, J. B. and Winchester, P. River Irwefl Flood Control Scheme: Benefit-Cost Analysis. Middlesex University Flood Hazard Research Centre, London, 1994.
5. Thames Region, NRA and Lewin Fryer and Partners. Maidenhead, Windsor and Eton Flood Alleviation Scheme, Benefit Assessment. National Rivers Authority, Maidenhead, 1992.
6. Anderson, M. G., Walling, D. E. and Bates, P. D. Floodplain Processes. John Wiley, Chichester, 1996.
7. Parker, D. J., Green, C. H. and Thompson, P. M. Urban Flood Protection Benefits: A Project Appraisal Guide. Gower Technical Press. Aldershot, 1987.
8. Coker, A. C., Tunstall, S. M., Penning-Rowsell, E. C. and Thompson, P. An Evaluation of the Recreational and Amenity Benefits of a Flood Alleviation Project for Maidenhead. Middlesex University Flood Hazard Research Centre, London, 1990.
9. Green, C. H. and Tunstall, S. M. The evaluation of river water-quality improvements by the contingent valuation method. App. Earns., 1991, 23, 1135.
10. Green, C. H. Why do we have to choose Eco. Earn. (In press.).
11. Green, C. H. Water, the environment and economics: what does experience teach us so far Canadian Wat. Res., 1997, 22, (1), 57.
12. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. Projeu Appraisal Guidance Notes. MAFF, London, 1993.
13. Penning-Rowsell, E. C. Incorporating above design standard (ADS) benefits into the appraisal of flood alleviation schemes. In Proc. 31st MAFF Conf. of River and Coastal Engineers. MAFF, London. 1996. 5.1.1.
14. Parker, D. J. Principles of urban flood alleviation benefit-cost appraisal. Paper presented at Seminar on Flood Preset or. an: Drainage, Hydraulics Research Ltd, Wallingford, Oxfordshire. 1987.
15. Penning-Rowsell, E. C. Flood. In: Pacione, M. App. Geog. Routledge. 1999, 95.
16. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. Flood and Coasta Defence Project Appraisal Guidance: Economic Appraisal. MAFF. London, 1999.
17. Fordham, M. H. Choice and constraint in flood hazard mitigation: the environmental attitudes ot floodplain residents and engineers. PhD thesis, Middlesex University, 1992.
18. Penning-Rowsell, E. C. and Fordham, M. Foods Across Europe: Flooa Hazard Assessment, Modelling and Management. Middlesex University Press, London, 1994.
19. O'Riordan, T. Valuation as revelation and reconciliation. Envir. Values. 1997, 6, (2), 169.
20. Penning-Rowsell, E. C., Gardner, J. L. and Winchester, P. New approaches to sustainable hazard management for Venice. Gao. J., 1998, 164, 1, 1.
21. HM Treasury. Economic Appraisal in Central Government: A Technica Guide for Government Departments. HMSO, London, 1991.