|
Volumn 55, Issue 3 Suppl, 2000, Pages 137-140
|
A comparison of the Abortion Rights Mobilization and Population Council trials.
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ABORTIVE AGENT;
MIFEPRISTONE;
MISOPROSTOL;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AMBULATORY CARE;
ARTICLE;
CHEMICALLY INDUCED DISORDER;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
INDUCED ABORTION;
INTRAVAGINAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION;
METHODOLOGY;
MIDDLE AGED;
NAUSEA;
ORAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION;
PREGNANCY;
VOMITING;
ABORTIFACIENT AGENTS, NONSTEROIDAL;
ABORTIFACIENT AGENTS, STEROIDAL;
ABORTION, INDUCED;
ADMINISTRATION, INTRAVAGINAL;
ADMINISTRATION, ORAL;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
CLINICAL TRIALS;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
MIDDLE AGED;
MIFEPRISTONE;
MISOPROSTOL;
NAUSEA;
OFFICE VISITS;
PREGNANCY;
VOMITING;
|
EID: 0033660891
PISSN: 00988421
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (12)
|
References (0)
|