A study of the effectiveness of different' measuring times and counting methods of human radial pulse rates

Journal of Clinical Nursing

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 146-152

  Hwu, Yueh Juen ^a,c   Coates, Vivien E ^a   Lin, Feng Yu ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER   (United Kingdom)

^b Chinese Overseas College of Commerce   (Taiwan)

^c CHUNGTAI INST HLTH SCI TECHNOL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NURSING; NURSING ASSESSMENT; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; PULSE RATE; RADIAL ARTERY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; MALE; NURSING ASSESSMENT; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; PULSE; RADIAL ARTERY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0033660280     PISSN: 09621067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2000.00350.x     Document Type: Article

References (2)

1. Campbell H.N. & Knapp T.R. (1988) Nurses' attitudes toward conventional and automated vital signs measurement methods. Medicine Instrument 22(5), 257-262.
2. Jones M.L. (1970) Accuracy of pulse rates counted for fifteen, thirty and sixty seconds. Military Medicine 12, 1127-1136.