Qualitative outcome analysis: Evaluating nursing interventions for complex clinical phenomena

Journal of Nursing Scholarship

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 125-130

  Morse, Janice M ^a,b   Penrod, Janice ^c   Hupcey, Judith E ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Nursing interventions; Outcome evaluation; Patient outcomes; Qualitative research

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; METHODOLOGY; MORALITY; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; REVIEW; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; INTERVENTION STUDIES; MORALE; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 0033655053     PISSN: 15276546     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2000.00125.x     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Good, M.D. (1992). Qualitative designs for assessing interventions in primary care: A discussion. In F. Tudiver, M.J. Bass, E.B. Dunn, P.G. Norton, & M. Stewart (Eds.), Research methods for primary care: Vol. 4. Assessing interventions: Traditional and innovative methods (96-105). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. McWilliam, C.L. (1992). Options for nurses in the primary care setting. In F. Tudiver, M.J. Bass, E.B. Dunn, P.G. Norton, & M. Stewart (Eds.), Research methods for primary care: Vol. 4. Assessing interventions: Traditional and innovative methods (208-218). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3. Morse, J.M. (1991). Evaluating qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 1(3), 283-285.
4. Morse, J.M. (1997). Considering theory derived from qualitative research. In J.M. Morse (Ed.), Completing a qualitative project: Details and dialogue (163-188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Morse, J.M., & Doberneck, B. (1995). Delineating the concept of hope. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 27, 283-291.
6. Morse, J.M., Hutchinson, S., & Penrod, J. (1998). From theory to practice: The development of assessment guides from qualitatively derived theory. Qualitative Health Research, 8(3), 329-340.
7. Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8. Patton, M.Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Penrod, J., & Morse, J.M. (1997). Strategies for assessing and fostering hope: The hope assessment guide. Oncology Nursing Forum, 24, 1055-1063.
10. Sandelowski, M. (1996). Focus on qualitative methods: Using qualitative methods in intervention studies. Research in Nursing & Health, 19, 359-364.
11. Wilson, H.S. (1985). Research in nursing. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.