Beyond joint implementation - designing flexibility into global climate policy

Energy Policy

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 17-27

  Begg, K G ^a   Jackson, T ^a   Parkinson, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Flexibility mechanisms; Joint implementation; The Kyoto Protocol

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GAS EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC POLICY;

GLOBAL CLIMATE POLICY;

CLIMATOLOGY;

CLIMATE CHANGE; EMISSION CONTROL; INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT; KYOTO PROTOCOL;

EUROPE;

EID: 0033652646     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00077-X     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Context and early origins of the intergovernmental panel on climate change
2. Structural and process history of the intergovernmental panel on climate change
3. The incremental cost of climate change mitigation projects
4. The strategy of joint implementation in the framework convention on climate change
5. Measures for managing joint implementation - dealing with complexity and uncertainty
6. Evaluating joint implementation options - an illustrative analysis
7. Environmental and social aspects of joint implementation - methodologies and case study results
8. The flexibility of language and the language of flexibility
9. Least-cost greenhouse planning - supply curves for greenhouse gas abatement
10. Joint implementation and cost-effectiveness under the framework convention on climate change
11. On the baseline
12. 2 emissions in nine countries
13. Joint implementation - the baseline issue: Economic and political aspects
14. Accounting for emissions reductions and costs - methodology and case study results
15. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis - methodology and case study results
16. JI/CDM Crediting under the Kyoto Protocol: Does interim period banking help or hinder GHG emissions reduction
17. The efficiency of international co-operation in mitigating climate change: Analysis of joint implementation and emission allowance trading for the Federal Republic of Germany, the Russian Federation and Indonesia
18. UNEP Greenhouse gas abatement costing studies
19. Implementing the Kyoto Protocol: Why JI and CDM show more promise than international emissions trading