|
Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 69-73
|
An argument against research on people with intellectual disabilities.
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ANALYTICAL APPROACH;
ARTICLE;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
ETHICAL THEORY;
HUMAN;
HUMAN EXPERIMENT;
INFORMED CONSENT;
MEDICAL ETHICS;
MENTAL CAPACITY;
MENTAL DEFICIENCY;
MENTAL HEALTH THERAPIES;
MENTAL STRESS;
MISCELLANEOUS NAMED GROUPS;
MORALITY;
RESEARCH SUBJECT;
VULNERABLE POPULATION;
ANALYTICAL APPROACH;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
MENTAL HEALTH THERAPIES;
ETHICAL THEORY;
ETHICS, MEDICAL;
HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION;
HUMANS;
INFORMED CONSENT;
MENTAL COMPETENCY;
MENTAL RETARDATION;
MORALS;
NONTHERAPEUTIC HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION;
PERSONS;
RESEARCH SUBJECTS;
STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;
THERAPEUTIC HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION;
VULNERABLE POPULATIONS;
|
EID: 0033648616
PISSN: 13867423
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1023/A:1009924810229 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (6)
|
References (0)
|