Serial Extraction or Premolar Extraction in the Permanent Dentition? Comparison of Duration and Outcome of Orthodontic Treatment;Serienextraktion oder Prämolarenextraktion im bleibenden Gebiss? Vergleich von Behandlungsdauer und Behandlungsergebnis

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 207-216

  Wagner, Michael ^b   Berg, Rolf ^a  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Duration and outcome of orthodontic treatment; Serial extractions

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTITION; HUMAN; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; PREMOLAR TOOTH; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS; TIME; TOOTH OCCLUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; BICUSPID; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL OCCLUSION; DENTITION, MIXED; DENTITION, PERMANENT; HUMANS; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SERIAL EXTRACTION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0033643442     PISSN: 14345293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s000560050006     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Björk A, Skieller V. Facial development and tooth eruption. An implant study at the age of puberty. Am J Orthod 1972;62:339-83.
2. Bunon, R. Essay sur les maladies des dents, où l'on propose les moyens de leur procurer une bonne confirmation dès la plus tendre enfance, et d'en assurer la conservation pendant tout le cours de la vie (published 1743 in Paris).
3. Dale JG. Guidance of occlusion: serial extraction. In: Graber TM, Swain BF. Orthodontics: Current principles and techniques. St. Louis: Mosby, 1985:259-366.
4. DeGuzman L, Bahiraei D, Vig KWL, et al. The validation of the Peer Assessment Rating index for malocclusion severity and treatment difficulty. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:172-6.
5. Dewel BF. A critical analysis of serial extraction in orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1959;45:424-55.
6. Dewel BF. Serial extraction: Its limitations and contraindications in orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1967;53:904-21.
7. Graber TM. Serial extraction: a continuous diagnostic and decisional process. Am J Orthod 1971;60:541-75.
8. Haruki T, Little R. Early versus late treatment of crowded first premolar extraction cases: Postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Angle Orthod 1998;68:61-8.
9. Hotz RP. Active supervision of the eruption of the teeth by extraction. Trans Eur Orthod Soc 1947-48;34-47.
10. Kjellgren B. Serial extraction as a corrective procedure in dental orthopedic therapy. Trans Eur Orthod Soc 1947-48;134-60.
11. Little RM, Riedel RA, Engst ED. Serial extraction of first pre-molars - postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Angle Orthod 1990;60:255-62.
12. Mayne WR. Serial extraction. In: Graber TM, ed. Current orthodontic principles and techniques. St. Louis: Mosby, 1975: 259-364.
13. Norman F. Serial extraction. Angle Orthod 1965;35:149-57.
14. Proffit WR. Contemporary orthodontics. St. Louis: Mosby, 1986:312-53.
15. Richmond S, Shaw W C, Roberts CT, et al. The PAR index (Peer Assessment Rating): methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:180-7.
16. Tulloch CJF, Phillips C, Proffit, WR. Benefit of early Class II treatment: Progress report of a two-phase randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:62-72.
17. Tweed CH. Clinical orthodontics, Vol I. St. Louis: Mosby, 1966:248-68.