|
Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 435-440
|
'End-of-life' decision making within intensive care - Objective, consistent, defensible?
|
Author keywords
Critical care; Ethics; Euthanasia; Medical; Passive
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
EUTHANASIA;
FAMILY;
HOSPITAL ADMISSION;
HUMAN;
INFORMED CONSENT;
INTENSIVE CARE;
INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION;
LIFE;
MANAGER;
MEDICAL ASSESSMENT;
MEDICAL AUDIT;
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING;
MEDICAL STAFF;
NURSE;
PATIENT CARE;
QUESTIONNAIRE;
RELATIVE;
STRESS;
UNITED KINGDOM;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
EMPIRICAL APPROACH;
ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL;
COMMUNICATION;
DECISION MAKING;
ETHICS, MEDICAL;
EUTHANASIA, PASSIVE;
GREAT BRITAIN;
HUMANS;
INTENSIVE CARE UNITS;
LIFE SUPPORT CARE;
NURSE ADMINISTRATORS;
PATIENT ADMISSION;
QUESTIONNAIRES;
STATE MEDICINE;
WITHHOLDING TREATMENT;
|
EID: 0033637222
PISSN: 03066800
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1136/jme.26.6.435 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (32)
|
References (28)
|