Growth cycles with technology shifts and externalities

Economic Modelling

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 139-170

  Eriksson, Clas ^a   Lindh, Thomas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÄVLE   (Sweden)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Cycles; Economic growth; General purpose technologies

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033636208     PISSN: 02649993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0264-9993(99)00025-5     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Aghion, P., Howitt, P., 1992. A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60, 323-351.
2. Aghion, P., Howitt, P., 1997. Endogenous Growth Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
3. Aghion P., Howitt P., 1998. On the Macroeconomic Effects of Major Technological Change. In: Helpman (ed.).
4. Barro, R.J., Sala-i-Martin, X., 1995. Economic Growth. McGraw-Hill, New York.
5. Basu S., Fernald J.G., Kimball, M.S., 1998. Are Technology Improvements Contractionary?, mimeo, Harvard University.
6. Bresnahan, T.F., Trajtenberg, M., 1994. General purpose technologies: Engines of growth? J. Econom. 65 (1), 83-108.
7. Caballero R.J., Jaffe A.B., 1993. How high are the giants' shoulders: An empirical assessment of knowledge spillovers and creative destruction in a model of economic growth. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, pp.15-74.
8. David, P.A., 1991. Computer and the dynamo: The modern productivity paradox in a not-too-distant mirror. Technology and Productivity: The Challenge for Economic Policy. OECD, Paris, pp. 315-347.
9. Dixit, A.K., Mirrlees, J.A., Stern, N.H., 1975. Optimum saving with economies of scale. Rev. Econ. Stud. 42 (3), 303-325.
10. Eriksson, C., 1996. Market failures in the R & D growth model with endogenous labor supply. J. Pub. Econ. 61, 445-454.
11. Griliches, Z., 1992. The search for R & D spillovers. Scand. J. Econ. 94, S29-S47.
12. Griliches, Z., 1994. Productivity, R & D, and the data constraint. Am. Econ. Rev. 84 (1), 1-23.
13. Grossman, G.M., Helpman, E., 1991. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
14. Hahn, F.H., 1993 On growth theory. In: Economics in a changing world. Proceedings at the Tenth International Economic Association World Congress in Moscow 1992, Macmillan, London.
15. Helpman E. (Ed.), 1998. General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
16. Helpman E., Rangel A., 1998a. Adjusting to a new technology: Experience and training, NBER Working Paper No. 6551.
17. Helpman E., Trajtenberg M., 1998b. A Time to Sow and a Time to Reap: Growth Based on General Purpose Technologies, in Helpman (ed.), pp. 55-84.
18. Helpman E., Trajtenberg M., 1998. Diffusion of General Purpose Technologies, in Helpman (ed.), pp. 85-120.
19. Howitt P., 1998. Measurement, Obsolescence, and General Purpose Technologies, in Helpman (ed.), pp. 219-251.
20. Jones, C.I., 1995. Time series tests of endogenous growth models. Q. J. Econ. 110, 495-525.
21. Jones C.I., 1998. Growth: With or Without Scale Effects? mimeo, Stanford University.
22. Judd, K.L., 1985. On the performance of patents. Econometrica 53, 567-586.
23. Nahuis R., 1998. The Dynamics of a General Purpose Technology in a Research and Assimilation Model. Center Discussion Paper No. 98119, Tilburg.
24. Segerstrom, P., 1998. Endogenous growth without scale effects. Am. Econ. Rev. 88 (5), 1290-1310.
25. Shleifer, A., 1986. Implementation cycles. J. Polit. Econ. 94 (6), 1163-1190.
26. Weitzman, M.L., 1970. Optimum growth with scale economies in the creation of overhead capital. Rev. Econ. Stud. 37 (4), 555-570.
27. Young, A., 1998. Growth without scale effects. J. Polit. Econ. 106, 41-63.