Ethics, society and occupational reproductive hazards: Fetal consequences?

Women and Health

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 25-37

  Sever, Lowell E ^a  

^a BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Ethics; Fetal protection policies; Occupational health; Reproductive hazards

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COURT; DECISION MAKING; EMPLOYER; FEMALE; FETUS; FETUS RISK; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN RIGHTS; JUSTICE; LEGAL LIABILITY; MATERNAL WELFARE; MEDICAL ETHICS; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; OCCUPATIONAL HAZARD; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0033635257     PISSN: 03630242     EISSN: 15410331     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J013v30n03_02     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Angell, M., 1996. Science on trial:The clash of medical evidence and the law in the breast implant case., London:W. W. Norton and Company.
2. Beauchamp, T.L., and Childress, J., 1989. Principles of biomedical ethics, 3rd ed., New York:Oxford University Press.
3. Becker, M.E., 1986. From Muller v. Oregon to fetal vulnerability policies. University of Chicago Law Review, 21:325–370.
4. Blank, R., 1993. Fetal protection in the workplace:Women's rights, business interests, and the unborn., New York:Columbia University Press.
5. Chavkin, W., Evanoff, R., Winkler, I., and Reath, G., 1983. “Reproductive hazards in the workplace:A course curriculum guide”. In The second X and women's health, Edited by:Tobach, E., and Rosoff, B., 101–129. Staten Island, NY:Jordian Press.
6. Clouser, K.D., 1996. “Concerning the inadequacies of principlism”. In Morality and the new genetics, Edited by:Gert, B., 57–76. Sudbury, MA:Jones and Bartlett.
7. Daniels, C.R., 1993. At women's expense:State power and the politics of fetal rights, Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
8. Grimes, D.A., 1986. Unplanned pregnancies in the U.S. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 67:430–442.
9. Katz, J.F., 1989. Hazardous working conditions and fetal protection policies:Women are going back to the future. Environmental Affairs, 17:201–230.
10. Leavitt, F.J., 1996. Commentary on Pollard. Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics, 6:7
11. LeRoy, B.S., 1993. “When theory meets practice:Challenges to the field of genetic counseling”. In Prescribing our future:Ethical challenges in genetic counseling, Edited by:Bartels, D.M., LeRoy, B.S., and Caplan, A.L., 39–54. New York:Aldine De Gruyter.
12. Mathieu, D., 1996. Preventing prenatal harm:Should the state intervene, 2nd ed., Washington, DC:Georgetown University Press.
13. Robertson, J.A., 1983. Procreative liberty and control of conception, pregnancy, and childbirth. Virginia Law Review, 69:405–464.
14. Robinson, J.C., 1991. Toil and toxins:Workplace struggles and political strategies for occupational health., Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
15. Sever, L.E., 1989. The state of the art and current issues regarding reproductive outcomes potentially associated with environmental exposures:Reduced fertility, reproductive wastage, congenital malformations, and birth weight. In. U.S. EPA Work Group on reproductive and developmental epidemiology:Issues and recommendations, October 24–26, 1988:95–121. (EPA Report 600/8-89/103) Cincinnati, OH:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
16. Sever, L.E., 1994. Congenital malformations related to occupational reproductive hazards. Occupational Medicine:State of the Art Reviews, 40:471–494.
17. Simon, C., 1978. Parental liability for prenatal injury. Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems, 14:47–92.
18. Supreme Court. 1991. International Union v. Johnson Controls. 111 S.Ct. 1196.
19. United States General Accounting Office. 1991. Reproductive and developmental toxicants:Regulatory actions provide uncertain protection, Washington, DC:General Accounting Office.