Impact on the organizational performance of the strategy-technology policy interaction

Journal of Business Research

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 55-64

  Parker, Abdul Rauf ^a  

^a Economic Strategies Expert   (Oman)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033634566     PISSN: 01482963     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0148-2963(98)00051-4     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abell, D.: Defining the Business: The Starting Point in Strategic Planning, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 1980.
2. Adler, P.: Technology strategy: Guide to the literature, in Research on Technological Innovation, Management and Policy, R. S. Rosenbloom, and R. A. Burgleman, eds., JAI, Greenwich, CT. 1989, pp. 1-25.
3. Anderson, P., and Tushman, M.: Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1990): 604-635.
4. Armour, H. W., and Teece, D.: Vertical intergration and technological innovation. Review of Economic and Statistics 62 (1980): 470-474.
5. Arnold, H.: Moderator variables: A clarification on conceptual, analytical, and psychometric issues. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 29 (1982): 143-174.
6. Bracker, J. S., and Pearson, J. N.: Planning and financial performance of small firms. Academy of Management Journal 7 (1986): 503-522.
7. Burgleman, R. A., and Rosenbloom, R. S.: Research on Technological Innovation, Management and Policy, vol. 4, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT. 1989.
8. Buzzell, R., and Gale, B.: The PIMS Principles: Linking Strategy to Performance, Free Press, New York. 1987.
9. Camillus, J. C.: Technology-driven and market-driven life cycles: Implications for multinational corporate strategy. Columbia Journal of Business (1984): 56-60.
10. Capon, N., and Glazer, R.: Marketing and technology: A strategy coalingment. Journal of Marketing 51 (1987): 1-14.
11. Chandler, A. D., Jr.: Strategy and Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 1962.
12. Cooper, R.: Defining the new product strategy. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management (1987): 184-193.
13. Council of Competitiveness: Gaining New Ground: Technology Priorities for America's Future, Council of Competitiveness, Washington, DC. 1991.
14. Dean, J. W., and Susman, G. I.: Strategic responses to global competition, in Strategy, Organizational Design and Human Resource Management, C. Snow, ed., JAI, Greenwich, CT. 1989, pp. 297-331.
15. Dess, G., and Davies, P.: Porter's (1980) generic strategies as determinants of strategic group membership and organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal 27 (1984): 467-488.
16. Everitt, B. S.: Cluster Analysis, Halsted Press, London. 1974.
17. Ford, D.: Develop your technology strategy. Long-range Planning 21 (1980): 85-95.
18. Foster, R.: Working the s-curve - Assessing technological threats. Research Management 29 (1986): 17-20.
19. Geroski, P., and Murfin, A.: Advertising and the dynamics of market structure: The UK car industry, 1958-1983. British Journal of Management 1 (1990): 77-90.
20. Govindarajan, V.: A contingency approach to strategy implementation at the business unit level: Intergrating administrative mechanisms with strategy. Academy of Management Journal 31 (1988): 828-853.
21. Habermeier, K. F.: Product use and product improvement. Research Policy 19 (1990): 271-283.
22. Hall, R.: The strategic analysis of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal 13 (1992): 135-144.
23. Hambrick, D., MacMillian, I. C., and Barbosa, R. R.: Business unit strategy and changes in product R&D budget. Management Science 2 (1983): 757-760.
24. Hayes, R., and Wheelwright, S.: Restoring Our Competitive Edge: Competing Through Manufacturing, Wiley, New York. 1984.
25. Hills, T.: Manufacturing Strategy: Test and Cases, Richard Irwin, Homewood, IL. 1989.
26. Hofer, C. W., and Schendel, D.: Strategy Formulation: Analytical Concepts, West Publishing, St. Paul, MN. 1978.
27. Itami, H., and Numagami, T.: Dynamic interaction between strategy and technology. Strategic Management Journal 13 (Winter, 1992): 119-136.
28. Jaikumar, R., and Bohn, R. E.: The development of intelligent systems for industrial use: A conceptual framework, Research on Technological Innovation, Management and Policy, vol. 3, in R. S. Rosenbloom, ed., JAI, Greenwich, CT. 1986, pp. 169-211.
29. Maidique, M. A., and Patch, B. J.: Corporate strategy and technology policy, in Readings in Management of Innovation, 2nd Ed., Tushman, and Moore, eds., Ballinger, Cambridge, MA. 1988, pp. 236-248.
30. Meredith, J.: The strategic advantages of new manufacturing technologies for small firms. Strategic Management Journal 8 (1987): 248-258.
31. Miller, A.: A taxonomy of technological settings with related strategies and performance levels. Strategic Management Journal 9 (1988): 238-254.
32. Oster, A.: Modern Competitive Analysis, Oxford University Press, New York. 1990.
33. Parthasarthy, R., and Sethi, S. P.: Relating strategy and structure to flexible automation: A test of fit and performance implications. Strategic Management Journal 14 (1993): 529-550.
34. Porter, M. E.: Competitive Strategy, Free Press, New York. 1980.
35. Porter, M. E.: The technological dimension of competitive strategy, in Research on Technological Innovation, Management, and Policy, R. S. Rosenbloom, ed., Jai, Greenwich, CT. 1983, pp. 1-33.
36. Porter, M. E.: Competitive Advantage. Free Press, New York. 1985.
37. Prahalad, C. K., and Hamel, G.: The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review (May-June 1990): 79-91.
38. Reger, R. K., Duhaime, I. M., and Stimpert, J. L.: Deregulation, strategic choice, risk, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal 13 (1992): 189-204.
39. Rosenberg, N.: Perspectives on Technology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA. 1976.
40. Scherer, F. M.: Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, 2nd Ed., Houghton-Mifflin, New York. 1980.
41. Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., and Pearlman, K.: Task differences as moderators of aptitude test validity in selection: A red herring. Journal of Applied Psychology 66 (1981): 166-185.
42. Shepherd, W.: The Economics of Industrial Organization, 2nd Ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 1985.
43. Thompson, J. D.: Organization in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York. 1967.
44. Thurow, L.: A weakness in process technology. Science (1987): 1659-1663.
45. Van de Ven A., and Ferry, D.: Measuring and Assessing Organizations, Wiley, New York. 1980.
46. Venkatraman, N.: Strategic orientation of business enterprises: The construct, dimensionality, and measuremnt. Management Science 35 (1989): 952-962.
47. Zahra, S.: Predictor and outcomes of corporate entrepreneuership: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing 5 (1991): 259-285.
48. Zahra, S., and Covin, J.: Business strategy, technology policy, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal 14 (1993): 451-478.