Evaluation of Reagent-Based and Product-Based Strategies in the Design of Combinatorial Library Subsets

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 63-70

  Jamois, Eric A ^a   Hassan, Moises ^a   Waldman, Marvin ^a  

^a ACCELRYS INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BENZODIAZEPINE DERIVATIVE; DYES, REAGENTS, INDICATORS, MARKERS AND BUFFERS; OLIGOPEPTIDE;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY;

BENZODIAZEPINES; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY TECHNIQUES; INDICATORS AND REAGENTS; OLIGOPEPTIDES;

EID: 0033630524     PISSN: 00952338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci990015k     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Gallop, M. A.; Barrett, R. W.; Dower, W. J.; Fodor, S. P. A.; Gordon, E. M. Applications of Combinatorial Technologies to Drug Discovery. 1. Background and Peptide Combinatorial Libraries. J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 1233-1251.
2. Gallop, M. A.; Barrett, R. W.; Dower, W. J.; Fodor, S. P. A.; Gordon, E. M. Applications of Combinatorial Technologies to Drug Discovery. 2. Combinatorial Organic Synthesis, Library Screening Strategies, and Future Directions. J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 1385-1401.
3. Kick, E. K.; Roe, D. C.; Skillman, A. G.; Liu, G.; Ewing, T. J. A.; Sun, Y.; Kuntz, I. D.; Ellman, J. A. Structure-Based Design and Combinatorial Chemistry Yield Low Nanomolar Inhibitor of Cathepsin D. Chem. Biol. 1997, 4, 297-307.
4. Combinatorial Chemistry; Czarnik, A. W.; DeWitt, S. H., Eds.; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1997.
5. Johnson, M.; Maggiora, G. M. Concepts and Applications of Molecular Similarity; Wiley: New York, 1990.
6. Snarey, M.; Terrett, N. K.; Willett, P.; Wilton, D. J. Comparison of Algorithms for Dissimilarity-Based Compound Selection. J. Mol. Graphics Mod. 1997, 15, 372-385.
7. Martin, E. J.; Blaney, J. M.; Siani, M. A.; Spellmeyer, D. C.; Wong, A. K.; Moos, W. H. Measuring Diversity: Experimental Design of Combinatorial Libraries for Drug Discovery. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 1431-1436.
8. Lajiness, M. S. Dissimilarity-Based Compound Selection Techniques. Perspect. Drug Discovery Des. 1997, 7/8, 65-84.
9. Lajiness, M. S. Molecular Similarity-Based Methods for Selecting Compounds for Screening. In Computational Chemical Graph Theory; Rouvray, D. H., Ed.; Nova Science: New York, 1990; pp 299-316.
10. Bawden, D. Application of Two-Dimensional Chemical Similarity Measures to Database Analysis and Querying. In Concepts and Applications of Molecular Similarity; Johnson, M. A., Maggiora, G. M., Eds.; John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1990; pp 65-76.
11. Lajiness, M. S. An Evaluation of the Performance of Dissimilarity Selection. In Rational Approaches to the Design of Bioactive Compounds; Silipo, C., Lajiness, M. S., Eds.; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, 1991; pp 201-204.
12. Marengo, E.; Todeschini, R. A New Algorithm for Optimal Distance-Based Experimental Design. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1992, 16, 37-44.
13. Holliday, J. D.; Ranade, S. S.; Willett, P. A Fast Algorithm for Selecting Sets of Dissimilar Structures from Large Chemical Databases. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1995, 14, 501-506.
14. Holliday, J. D.; Willett, P. Definitions of "Dissimilarity" for Dis-similarity-Based Compound Selection. J. Biomol. Screening 1996, 1, 145-151.
15. Hassan, M.; Bielawski, J. P.; Hempel, J. C.; Waldman, M. Optimization and Visualization of Molecular Diversity of Combinatorial Libraries. Mol. Diversity 1996, 2, 64-74.
16. Brown, R. D.; Martin, Y. C. Use of Structure-Activity Data to Compare Structure-Based Clustering Methods and Descriptors tor Use in Compound Selection. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 572-584.
17. Brown, R. D.; Martin, Y. C. The Information Content of 2D and 3D Structural Descriptors Relevant to Ligand-Receptor Binding. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 1-9.
18. Gillet, V. J.; Willett, P.; Bradshaw, J. The Effectiveness of Reactant Pools for Generating Structurally-Diverse Combinatorial Libraries. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 731-740.
19. Perlman, R. S.; Smith, K. M. Metric Validation and the Receptor-Relevant Subspace Concept. J. Chem. Inf: Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 28-35.
20. Mason, J. S.; McLay, I. M.; Lewis, R. A. New Perspectives in Drug Design; Dean, P. M., Nolles, G., Newton, C. G., Eds.; Academic Press: London, 1995; pp 225-253.
21. Mason, J. S.; Pickett, S. D. Partition-based selection. Perspect. Drug Discovery Des. 1997, 7/8, 85-114.
22. 2, Version 4.0; Molecular Simulations Inc.: 9685 Scranton Rd., San Diego, CA 92121.
23. Brown, R. D. Descriptors for Diversity Analysis. Perspect. Drug Discovery Des. 1997, 7/8, 31-49.
24. Ellman, J. A. Design, Synthesis and Evaluation of Small-Molecule Libraries. Acc. Chem. Res. 1996, 29, 132-143.
25. Langer, T.; Hoffmann, R. D. New Principal Components Derived Parameters Describing Molecular Diversity of Heteroaromatic Residues. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1998, 17, 211-223.
26. Everitt, B. S.; Dunn, G. Applied Multivariate Data Analysis; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, 1992.