Retentive and compressive strengths of modified zinc oxide-eugenol cements

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 69-75

  Lee, S Y ^a   Wang, C C ^a   Chen, B C ^a   Lai, Y L ^b  

^a NATIONAL YANG MING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b TAIPEI VETERANS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Compressive strength; Film thickness; Progressive cementation; Retention; Temporary cement

Indexed keywords

ZINC OXIDE EUGENOL;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTURE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STATISTICS; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTURE RETENTION; DENTURE, PARTIAL, TEMPORARY; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; SURFACE PROPERTIES; ZINC OXIDE-EUGENOL CEMENT;

EID: 0033628953     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00040-8     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Olin PS, Rudney JD, Hill EM. Retentive strength of six temporary dental cements. Quintessence International 1990;21:197-200.
2. Ayad MF, Rosenstiel SF, Salama M. Influence of tooth surface roughness and type of cement on retention of complete cast crowns. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1997;77:116-121.
3. Oldham DF, Swartz ML, Phillips RW. Retentive properties of dental cements. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1964;14:760-768.
4. Hebel KS, Gajjar RC. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1997;77:28-35.
5. Dixon DL, Breeding LC, Lilly KR. Use of luting agents with an implant system: Part II. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1992;68:885-890.
6. Breeding LC, Dixon DL. Compression resistance of four interocclusal recording materials. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1992;68:876-878.
7. Kerby RE, McGlumphy EA, Holloway JA. Some physical properties of implant abutment luting cements. International Journal of Prosthodontics 1992;5:321-325.
8. Singer A, Serfaty V. Cement-retained implant-supported fixed partial dentures: a 6-month to 3-year follow-up. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 1996;11:645-649.
9. Ganor Y, Indig B, Gross M. Retrievable cemented crown options on implant-supported angled abutments: a case report. Quintessence International 1996;27:679-684.
10. Phillips RW, Love DR. The effect of certain additive agents on the physical properties of zinc-oxide eugenol mixtures. Journal of Dental Research 1961;40:294-303.
11. Norman RD, Phillips RW, Swartz ML, et al. The effect of particle size on the physical properties of zinc-oxide eugenol mixtures. Journal of Dental Research 1964;43:252-262.
12. Civjan S, Huget EF, Wolfhard G, et al. Characterization of zinc oxide-eugenol cements reinforced with acrylic resin. Journal of Dental Research 1972;51:107-114.
13. Silvey RG, Myers GE. Clinical study of dental cements VI. A study of zinc phosphate, EBA-reinforced zinc oxide eugenol and polyacrylic acid cements as luting agents in fixed prostheses. Journal of Dental Research 1977;56:1215-1218.
14. Jendresen MD, Phillips RW, Swartz ML, et al. A comparative study of four zinc oxide and eugenol formulations as restorative materials I. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1969;21:176-183.
15. Jendresen MD, Phillips RW. A comparative study of four zinc oxide and eugenol formulations as restorative materials II. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1969;21:300-309.
16. Wilson AD, Batchelor RF. Zinc oxide-eugenol cements II. Study of erosion and disintegration. Journal of Dental Research 1970;49:593-598.
17. Norman RD, Swartz ML, Phillips RW. Studies on film thickness, solubility, and marginal leakage of dental cements. Journal of Dental Research 1963;42:950-958.
18. Wilson AD, Clinton DJ, Miller RP. Zinc oxide-eugenol cements IV. Microstructure and hydrolysis. Journal of Dental Research 1973;52:253-260.
19. Anderson Jr JR, Meyers GE. Physical properties of some zinc oxide-eugenol cements. Journal of Dental Research 1966;45:379-387.
20. Hodosh AJ, Hodosh S, Hodosh M. Potassium nitrate-zinc oxide eugenol temporary cement for provisional crowns to diminish post-preparation tooth pain. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1993;70:493-495.
21. Hodosh M, Hodosh SH, Hodosh AJ. Maintenance of pulpal vitality using potassium nitrate-polycarboxylate cement cavity liner. Quintessence International 1991;22:495-502.
22. Lewinstein I, Daniel Z, Azaz B, et al. Effect of fluoride varnish on the retentive strength of provisional crowns luted with various temporary cements. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1992;68:733-736.
23. Wolf O, Gedalia I, Reinsstein I, et al. Effect of addition of Cafpo3 to a zinc oxide-eugenol base liner on the michrohardeness and fluoride content of dentin. Journal of Dental Research 1973;52:467-471.
24. Wilson AD, Mesley RJ. Zinc oxide-eugenol cements III. Infrared spectroscopic studies. Journal of Dental Research 1972;51:1581-1588.
25. Jorgensen KD, Holast K. The relationship between the retention of cemented veneer crowns and the crushing strength of the elements. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 1967;25:355-359.