Influence of vessel size on early and late outcomes after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction

Journal of Invasive Cardiology

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 13-19

  Brodie, Bruce R ^a,c   Stuckey, Thomas D ^a   Hansen, Charles ^a   Kissling, Grace ^b   Muncy, Denise ^a  

^a MOSES H CONE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Acute myocardial infarction; Coronary reperfusion; Primary angioplasty; Vessel size

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORONARY BLOOD VESSEL; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART INFARCTION; HEART MUSCLE REPERFUSION; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; PATHOLOGY; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURVIVAL RATE; TIME; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY VESSELS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; MYOCARDIAL REPERFUSION; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURVIVAL RATE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0033628108     PISSN: 10423931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Grines CL, Brown KF, Marco J, et al. A comparison of immediate angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1993;328:673-679.
2. Zijlstra F, Jan De Boer M, Hoorntje JCA, et al. A comparison of immediate coronary angioplasty with intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1993;328:680-684.
3. Weaver WD, Simes J, Betriu A, et al. Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: A quantitative review. JAMA 1997;278:2093-2098.
4. Brodie BR, Grines CL, Ivanohoe R, et al. Six month clinical and angiographic follow-up after direct angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: Final results from the Primary Angioplasty Registry. Circulation 1994;25:156-162.
5. Savage MP, Goldberg S, Hirshfeld JW, et al. Clinical and angiographic determinants of primary coronary angioplasty success. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;17:22-28.
6. Hirshfeld JW, Schwartz JS, Jugo R, et al. Restenosis after coronary angioplasty: A multivariate statistical model to relate lesion and procedure variables to restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;18:647-656.
7. Kuntz RE, Safian RD, Carrozza JP, et al. The importance of acute luminal diameter in determining restenosis after coronary atherectomy or stenting. Circulation 1992;86:1827-1835.
8. Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, et al. A randomized comparison of coronary stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1994;331:496-501.
9. Brodie BR, Weintraub RA, Stuckey TD, et al. Outcomes of direct coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction in candidates and non-candidates for thrombolytic therapy. Am J Cardiol 1991;67:7-12.
10. Brodie BR. Primary angioplasty in a community hospital in the USA: Insights into the advantages and limitations. Br Heart J 1995;73:411-412.
11. Grines CL, Marslaese DL, Brodie BR, et al. Safety and cost-effectiveness of early discharge after primary angioplasty in low risk patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31:967-972.
12. Stone GW, Brodie BR, Griffin JJ, et al. Prospective multi-center study of the safety and feasibility of primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction: In-hospital and 30-day results of the PAMI Stent Pilot Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31:23-30.
13. TIMI Study Group. The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) Trial: Phase I findings. N Engl J Med 1985;312:932-936.
14. Kennedy JW, Trenholme SE, Kasser IS. Left ventricular volume and mass from single plane cine angiogram: A comparison of anteroposterior and right anterior oblique methods. Am Heart J 1970;80:343-352.
15. Saucedo JF, Abizaid AS, Kennard ED, et al. Vessel size is an independent predictor of one year clinical events after new device angioplasty: NACI Registry report (Abstr). Circulation 1997;96(Suppl 8):I-23.
16. Schatz RA, Goldberg S, Leon M, et al. Clinical experience with the Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;17(Suppl B):155B-159B.
17. Diaz L, Fajadet J, Cassagneau B, et al. The short term results and angiographic predictors of subacute thrombosis in the coronary implantation of the Palmaz-Schatz endoprosthesis. Rev Esp Cardiol 1994;47:747-753.
18. Karrillon G, Morice MC, Benveniste E, et al. Intercoronary stent implantation without ultrasound guidance and with replacement of conventional anticoagulation by antiplatelet therapy. Circulation 1996;94:1519-1527.
19. Akiyama T, Moussa I, Reimers B, et al. Angiographic and clinical outcome following coronary stenting of small vessels: A comparison with coronary stenting of large vessels. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:1610-1618.
20. Miketic S, Carlsson J, Tebbe U. Clinical and angiographic outcomes of NIR stent implantation in small vessels with unfavorable lesion morphology. J Invas Cardiol 1999;11:269-273.
21. Elezi S, Kastrati A, Neuman FJ, et al. Vessel size and long term outcome after coronary stent placement. Circulation 1998;98:1875-1880.