Constrained scaling: The effect of learned psychophysical scales on idiosyncratic response bias

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 137-151

  West, Robert L ^a,c   Ward, Lawrence M ^b   Khosla, Rahul ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONDITIONING; HEARING; HUMAN; LEARNING; LIGHT; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; VISION;

AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; LEARNING; LIGHT; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0033628093     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03212067     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. ALGOM, D., & MARKS, L. E. (1984). Individual differences in loudness processing and loudness scales. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 571-593.
2. ALGOM, D., & MARKS, L. E. (1990). Range and regression, loudness scales, and loudness processing: Toward a context-bound psychophysics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 706-727.
3. BAIRD, J. C., KREINDLER, M., & JONES, K. (1971). Generation of multiple ratio scales with a fixed stimulus attribute. Perception & Psychophysics, 9, 399-403.
4. BERGLUND, M. B. (1991). Quality assurance in environmental psychophysics. In S. J. Bolanowski, Jr., & G. A. Gescheider (Eds.), Ratio scaling of psychological magnitude: In honor of the memory of S. S. Stevens. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. BOLANOWSKI, S.J., JR., & GESCHEIDER, G. A. (EDS.) (1991). Ratio scaling of psychological magnitude: In honor of the memory of S. S. Stevens (pp. 140-162). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. CURTIS, D. W., ATTNEAVE, F., & HARRINGTON, T. L. (1968). A test of a two-stage model of magnitude judgment. Perception & Psychophysics, 3, 25-31.
7. HELLMAN, R. P., & MEISELMAN, C. H. (1988). Prediction of individual loudness exponents from cross modality matching. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 31, 605-615.
8. INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION (1959). Expression of physical and subjective magnitudes of sound [ISO/R-131-1959(E)]. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
9. KING, M. C., & LOCKHEAD, G. R. ( 1981 ). Response scales and sequential effects in judgment. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 599-603.
10. KOH, K. (1993). Induction of combination rules in two-dimensional function learning. Memory & Cognition, 21(5), 573-590.
11. KOH, K., & MEYER, D. E. (1991). Function learning: Induction of continuous stimulus-response relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory, & Cognition, 17, 811-836.
12. LILIENTHAL, M. G., & DAWSON, W. E. (1976). Inverse cross-modality matching: A test of ratio judgment consistency for group and individual data. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 252-260.
13. LOGUE, A. W. (1976). Individual differences in magnitude estimation of loudness. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 279-280.
14. LUCE, D. R., & Mo, S. S. (1965). Magnitude estimation of heaviness and loudness by individual observers: A test of a probabilistic response theory. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 18, 159-174.
15. MARKS, L. E. (1974a). On scales of sensation: Prolegomena to any future psychophysics that will be able to come forth as science. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 358-376.
16. MARKS, L. E. (1974b). Sensory processes: The new psychophysics. New York: Academic Press.
17. MARKS L. E. (1991). Reliability of magnitude matching. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 31-37.
18. MARKS, L. E., GALANTER, E., & BAIRD, J. C. (1995). Binaural summation after learning psychophysical functions for loudness. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1209-1216.
19. MARKS, L. E., & STEVENS, J. C. (1965). Individual brightness functions. Perception & Psychophysics, 1, 17-24.
20. MARKS, L. E., STEVENS, J. C., BARTOSHUK, L. M., GENT, J. G., RIFKIN, B., & STONE, V. K. (1988). Magnitude matching: The measurement of taste and smell. Chemical Senses, 13, 63-87.
21. POULTON, E. C. (1989). Bias in quantifying judgements. London: Erlbaum.
22. RULE, S. J., & MARKLEY, R. P. (1971). Subject differences in cross-modality matching. Perception & Psychophysics, 9, 115-117.
23. SCHNEIDER, B. (1980). Individual loudness functions determined from direct comparisons of loudness intervals. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 493-503.
24. SCHNEIDER, B. ( 1988). The additivity of loudness across critical bands: A conjoint measurement approach. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 211-222.
25. STEVENS, J. C., & MARKS, L. E. (1980). Cross-modality matching functions generated by magnitude estimation. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 379-389.
26. STEVENS, S. S. (1955). The measurement of loudness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27, 815-829.
27. STEVENS, S. S. (1975). Psychophysics: Introduction to its perceptual, neural and social prospects. New York: Wiley.
28. STEVENS, S. S., & GUIRAO, M. (1964). Subjective scaling of length and area and the matching of length to loudness and brightness. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 177-186.
29. TEGHTSOONIAN, M., & TEGHTSOONIAN, R. (1983). Consistency of individual exponents in cross-modal matching. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 203-214.
30. TEGHTSOONIAN, R. (1971). On the exponents in Stevens' law and the constants in Ekman's law. Psychological Review, 78, 71-80.
31. WANSCHURA R. G., & DAWSON, W. E. (1974). Regression effect and individual power functions over sessions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 806-812.
32. WARD, L. M. (1975). Sequential dependencies and response range in cross-modality matches of duration to loudness. Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 217-223.
33. WARD, L. M. (1982). Mixed-modality psychophysical scaling: Sequential dependencies and other properties. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 53-62.
34. WARD, L. M. (1990). Critical bands and mixed-frequency scaling: Sequential dependencies, equal-loudness contours, and power function exponents. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 551-562.
35. WARD, L. M. (1992). Who knows? In G. Borg & N. Neely (Eds.) Fechner Day 92 (pp. 79-100). Stockholm: International Society for Psychophysics.
36. WEST, R. L., & WARD, L. M. (1994). Constrained scaling. In L. M. Ward (Ed.), Fechner Day 94 (pp. 225-230). Vancouver: International Society for Psychophysics.
37. ZWISLOCKI, J. J. (1983). Group and individual relations between sensation magnitudes and their numerical estimates. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 460-468.
38. ZWISLOCKI, J. J. (1991). Natural measurement. In S. J. Bolanowski & G. A. Gescheider (Eds.), Ratio scaling of psychological magnitude: In honor of the memory of S. S. Stevens (pp. 18-26). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. ZWISLOCKI, J. J., & GOODMAN, D. A. (1980). Absolute scaling of sensory magnitudes: A validation. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 28-38.